Website review, no card needed
ug.edu.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202632 issues · 80 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on ug.edu.pl, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 944 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 925 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 976 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 978 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 952 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 946 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 917 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 916 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 921 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 949 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 973 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 996 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 116 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 1.3 MB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 66). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
456 KiB13 images could be 456 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
skynettechnologies.com adds 5 ms
5 msskynettechnologies.com costs a phone 5 ms of main-thread work and 410 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 94 KiBAbout 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
122 KiBAbout 122 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (skynettechnologies.com and Google Fonts), adding 664 KiB and 5 ms of main-thread time.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 50 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
8 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 232 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.498
0.498The layout shifts by 0.498 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.7 s
6.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sYour largest element takes 4.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Pożegnanie dr. Grzegorza Stunży”.
30 images without width and height
30 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Time to Interactive: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 98 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 487 ms
487 msReal visitors wait 487 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1270x580.jpg.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (427 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
44 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1270x580.jpg.webp at 1,270 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 44 KiB.
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 65.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 105 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 1.1 MB (52), fonts 379 KiB (13) and scripts 328 KiB (24). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “| Uniwersytet Gdański”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://ug.edu.pl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
118 internal links, 37 external
The homepage links to 118 pages on ug.edu.pl and 37 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Uniwersytet Gdański - Strona Główna”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ug.edu.pl/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://ug.edu.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (762 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without a meta description
https://ug.edu.pl/kandydaci, https://ug.edu.pl/kandydaci/studia-wspolne-w-ramach-sea-eu, https://ug.edu.pl/rekrutacja/szkoly_doktorskie, https://ug.edu.pl/kandydaci/studia-podyplomowe, https://ug.edu.pl/rekrutacja/kursy_i_szkolenia and https://ug.edu.pl/kandydaci/potwierdzanie-efektow-uczenia and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://ug.edu.pl/kandydaci/potwierdzanie-efektow-uczenia, whose canonical is https://ug.edu.pl/pracownicy/strony_jednostek/biuro-jakosci-ksztalcenia/potwierdzanie-efektow-uczenia. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://ug.edu.pl/rekrutacja/studia_i_i_ii_stopnia_oraz_jednolite_magisterskie has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 37 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 662 words of copy
The homepage carries about 662 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ug.edu.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Gdansk University of Technology
Company
- Founded
- 1970
- Headquarters
- Oliva Campus
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on ug.edu.pl, including 12 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.