Website review, no card needed

uhaul.com logo

uhaul.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202634 issues · 87 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on uhaul.com, 11 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.3 sApr 18Oct 32.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.3 s
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
196 ms181 msApr 18Oct 3184 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026194 ms
Apr 25, 2026191 ms
May 2, 2026188 ms
May 9, 2026187 ms
May 16, 2026185 ms
May 23, 2026185 ms
May 30, 2026183 ms
Jun 6, 2026184 ms
Jun 13, 2026185 ms
Jun 20, 2026183 ms
Jun 27, 2026183 ms
Jul 4, 2026183 ms
Jul 11, 2026183 ms
Jul 18, 2026183 ms
Jul 25, 2026184 ms
Aug 1, 2026183 ms
Aug 8, 2026184 ms
Aug 15, 2026186 ms
Aug 22, 2026186 ms
Aug 29, 2026185 ms
Sep 5, 2026185 ms
Sep 12, 2026184 ms
Sep 19, 2026184 ms
Sep 26, 2026185 ms
Oct 3, 2026184 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of uhaul.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. uhaul.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. uhaul.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. uhaul.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. uhaul.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. uhaul.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. uhaul.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  7. uhaul.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  8. uhaul.com at 5.4 s5.4 s

Speed

8 to fix42
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.6 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 30). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    980 ms · 599 KiB

    About 599 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 980 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Airship and Qualtrics and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 892 ms

    892 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 892 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 48 KiB

    About 48 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    257 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (257 KiB).

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 242 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    28 KiB

    3 images could be 28 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 66 ms

    66 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 66 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Your largest element takes 7.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Couple moving items into a U-Haul storage facility”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.0 s

    19.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 918 ms

    918 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 918 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 194 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 719 ms

    719 ms

    Real visitors wait 719 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011

    0.011

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 100 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 100 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (36), images 536 KiB (12) and fonts 114 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 78.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9795
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8592
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 149 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 149 pages on uhaul.com and 22 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Looking for trucks, trailers, storage, U-Box® containers or moving supplies? With over 25,000 locations, U-Haul is your…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “U-Haul Offers More for You.”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Your moving and storage resource | U-Haul”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.uhaul.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.uhaul.com/SitemapIndex.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (898 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (13 KiB, 85 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    /NativeRedirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /NativeRedirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    /NativeRedirect, /Locations, /Dealer, /Archives/4/56 and /FrequentlyAskedQuestions/Trailer-Towing-Rentals have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /Trailer-Hitches, whose canonical is /Trailer-Hitches2. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“webkitRequestAnimationFrame is vendor-specific. Please use the standard requestAnimationFrame inste…”).

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    27 of 30 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • A 13-field form

    Your longest form asks for 13 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Only about 196 words

    The homepage has only about 196 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Start a Reservation”, “Learn More” and “Schedule an Install”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uhaul.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1945
Headquarters
Phoenix

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on uhaul.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25