Website review, no card needed
unitedmethodisthomes.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202644 issues · 82 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on unitedmethodisthomes.org, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 814 KiBAbout 814 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s23 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Improve image delivery
1.5 s · 308 KiB4 images could be 308 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 168 KiBAbout 168 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and insiderdata360online.com and others), adding 2.9 MB and 612 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 478 KiB25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (478 KiB).
Facebook adds 219 ms
219 msFacebook costs a phone 219 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
350 ms · 41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 300 ms
300 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 765 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,590 HTML elements
The page has 1,590 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 128 ms
128 msYour server sent the HTML in 128 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.1 s
16.1 sYour largest element takes 16.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “If you ever wonder about the next, b…”.
Time to Interactive: 22.3 s
22.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.1 s
11.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 246 ms
246 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 246 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006
0.006The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.0 MB in 133 requests
11.0 MBYour homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 133 requests on a phone: images 7.5 MB (44), scripts 2.0 MB (45) and other files 992 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.11 g of CO₂e: 373.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (1 element).
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
9 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “United Methodist Homes | Independent & Assisted Living Senior Care”.
6 H1 headlines
There are 6 <h1> headlines (“You care. We care. Let's talk.”, “Experience the Live-Better Lifestyle. It’s all ri…” and “What’s New at UMH”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (177 characters)
Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
33 internal links, 90 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on unitedmethodisthomes.org and 90 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/llms.txt (31 KiB, 143 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/employment-2, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
2 pages share a title
https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/umh-foundation and https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/annual-appeal-2026 all use the title “UMH Foundation - Donate and Support Elderly Care | United Methodist H…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/umh-foundation and https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/annual-appeal-2026 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/annual-appeal-2026 has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/campus-virtual-tours and https://www.unitedmethodisthomes.org/star-ratings have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
14 internal pages checked
We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Only about 33 words
The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Admissions and Contact” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 2 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 5 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unitedmethodisthomes.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- WordPress.com
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on unitedmethodisthomes.org, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.