Website review, no card needed
unsoed.ac.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202624 issues · 63 checks
This review found 24 issues worth fixing on unsoed.ac.id, 5 of them high impact, across 63 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 195 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 350 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 311 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
22 KiBAbout 22 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
16 KiB2 images could be 16 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 91
91/100Your mobile performance score is 91 (desktop: 96). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 475 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 498 ms
498 msYour server sent the HTML in 498 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 361 ms
361 msReal visitors wait 361 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 55% slower for real visitors
+55%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 311 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 4.9 s
4.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sYour largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “hero-banner”. Most of its time is resource load delay (1.9 s).
Time to Interactive: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 725 ms
725 msReal visitors wait 725 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 43% faster for real visitors
-43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.018
0.018The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.018, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 36 ms
36 msScripts block the page for only 36 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.18 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.18 g of CO₂e: 21.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 648 KiB in 39 requests
648 KiBYour homepage downloads 648 KiB in 39 requests on a phone: scripts 227 KiB (18), HTML 126 KiB (1) and other files 104 KiB (9). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 5 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (44 characters)
Your meta description is only 44 characters: “Website resmi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
Only 3 internal links
The homepage links to only 3 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
3 checks passed
Title: 30 characters
Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Universitas Jenderal Soedirman”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://unsoed.ac.id/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://unsoed.ac.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://unsoed.ac.id/siap-jadi-tuan-rumah-kmi-expo-xvii-2026-unsoed-sambut-368-kelompok-usaha-mahasiswa-se-indonesia, whose canonical is https://unsoed.ac.id/berita/siap-jadi-tuan-rumah-kmi-expo-xvii-2026-unsoed-sambut-368-kelompok-usaha-mahasiswa-se-indonesia. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 internal page checked
We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 98 words
The homepage has only about 98 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unsoed.ac.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
Company
- Founded
- 1920
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 24 issues on unsoed.ac.id, including 7 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.