Website review, no card needed

uprm.edu logo

uprm.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202643 issues · 88 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on uprm.edu, 23 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
105 ms82 msMay 16Oct 3187 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202686 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202690 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202695 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202693 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202686 ms
Aug 8, 202685 ms
Aug 15, 202686 ms
Aug 22, 202692 ms
Aug 29, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202697 ms
Sep 12, 2026102 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202692 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202686 ms
Oct 24, 202687 ms
Oct 31, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of uprm.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. uprm.edu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. uprm.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. uprm.edu at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. uprm.edu at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. uprm.edu at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. uprm.edu at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. uprm.edu at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. uprm.edu at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

8 to fix34
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    12.2 s · 3.6 MB

    85 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.2 s · 835 KiB

    About 835 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 s · 810 KiB

    9 images could be 810 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    940 ms · 203 KiB

    About 203 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 940 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • fastbots.ai adds 38 ms

    38 ms

    fastbots.ai costs a phone 38 ms of main-thread work and 610 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (fastbots.ai, ShareThis and Cloudflare and others), adding 874 KiB and 63 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 54 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 508 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 141 ms

    141 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 141 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.60

    0.60

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.60 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.2 s

    21.2 s

    Your largest element takes 21.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Sobre cuatro mil estudiantes de escuela superior de toda la…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.4 s

    17.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.655

    0.655

    The layout shifts by 0.655 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 2 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 173 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 173 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (94), images 1.8 MB (14) and stylesheets 340 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.24 g of CO₂e: 148.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8188
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    5 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 20 images without alt text

    20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8573
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (76 characters)

    Your title is 76 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Portada - Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez de la Universidad de Puerto Rico”.

  • Meta description is long (417 characters)

    Your meta description is 417 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 10 links crawlers can't follow

    10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 145 internal links, 36 external

    The homepage links to 145 pages on uprm.edu and 36 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.uprm.edu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.uprm.edu/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.uprm.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (719 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.uprm.edu/portada and / all use the title “Portada - Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez de la Universidad de Puer…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.uprm.edu/portales/mapa, https://www.uprm.edu/portada/buscar, https://www.uprm.edu/portales/acerca-del-rum, https://www.uprm.edu/portada/noticias, https://www.uprm.edu/cartero and https://www.uprm.edu/indicadores-de-exito-estudiantil and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.uprm.edu/portales/acerca-del-rum, whose canonical is https://www.uprm.edu/portales. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    /, https://www.uprm.edu/cartero, https://www.uprm.edu/indicadores-de-exito-estudiantil, https://www.uprm.edu/asuntosacademicos and https://www.uprm.edu/empleos have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.uprm.edu/portales/mapa and https://www.uprm.edu/cartero have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://data.stbuttons.click/data' from origin 'https://www.uprm.edu' has been blocked by …”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    23 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 271 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 271 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

1 checks passed
  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uprm.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
University of Puerto Rico

Company

Founded
1911

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on uprm.edu, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25