Website review, no card needed

urologygroup.com logo

urologygroup.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202632 issues · 82 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on urologygroup.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s2.9 sMay 9Oct 243.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms80 msMay 9Oct 2487 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202686 ms
Jun 6, 202686 ms
Jun 13, 202685 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202685 ms
Jul 4, 202684 ms
Jul 11, 202681 ms
Jul 18, 202682 ms
Jul 25, 202682 ms
Aug 1, 202683 ms
Aug 8, 202686 ms
Aug 15, 202686 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202686 ms
Sep 12, 202686 ms
Sep 19, 202686 ms
Sep 26, 202685 ms
Oct 3, 202686 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms
Oct 24, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of urologygroup.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. urologygroup.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. urologygroup.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. urologygroup.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. urologygroup.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. urologygroup.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. urologygroup.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. urologygroup.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. urologygroup.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix34
  • Improve image delivery

    7.1 s · 1.2 MB

    7 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.3 s · 826 KiB

    About 826 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 224 KiB

    About 224 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 621 ms

    621 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 621 ms of main-thread work and 742 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 512 ms

    512 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 512 ms of main-thread work and 350 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 89 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (89 KiB).

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 424 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 48 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.0 s

    23.0 s

    Your largest element takes 23.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Feel better. Live better. Guided by expertise and driven by…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.5 s

    23.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 991 ms

    991 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 991 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 400 ms

    400 ms

    Real visitors wait 400 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 123 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 123 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (18), scripts 1.6 MB (68) and fonts 382 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    kidney-stone-help-768x512.jpeg weighs 493 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (853 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9897
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7780
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “Home - The Urology Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 14 links crawlers can't follow

    14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 155 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 155 pages on urologygroup.com and 3 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Feel better. Live better.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.urologygroup.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, MedicalOrganization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.urologygroup.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.urologygroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,023 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.urologygroup.com/patient-portal, https://www.urologygroup.com/request-an-appointment and https://www.urologygroup.com/care-area/mens-urinary-sexual-health have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 85 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 483 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 483 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Request an Appointment”, “Request Your Medical Records” and “Provider Medical Records Request”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at urologygroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Oracle Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on urologygroup.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25