Website review, no card needed
ursinus.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202637 issues · 84 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on ursinus.edu, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.3 s
3.1 s
3.9 s
4.7 s
5.4 s
6.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
12.3 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 12.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.3 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 593 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (593 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 31). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.5 s
A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 3.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 558 KiB10 images could be 558 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 152 KiBAbout 152 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 698 ms
698 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 698 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 256 ms
256 msFacebook costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 442 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
heyhalda.com adds 149 ms
149 msheyhalda.com costs a phone 149 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 211 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 17.1 s
17.1 sThe first text or image appears after 17.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 41.7 s
41.7 sYour largest element takes 41.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The Sports & Humanities Hub took Ursinus students to the Ph…”.
Speed Index: 18.7 s
18.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.7 s
41.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 444 ms
444 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 444 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 153 ms
153 msReal visitors wait 153 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 675 ms
675 msReal visitors wait 675 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.7 MB in 480 requests
10.7 MBYour homepage downloads 10.7 MB in 480 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (44), scripts 3.6 MB (340) and fonts 2.8 MB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
52934_20260821_Convocation2026_145.rev.1787337168.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (159 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.02 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.02 g of CO₂e: 362.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 3 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
73 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on ursinus.edu and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “Located 25 miles from Philadelphia, Ursinus is consistently ranked in the top tier of National Liberal Arts Colleges by…”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Ursinus College | Homepage | Ursinus College”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ursinus.edu/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ursinus.edu/sitemap.livewhale.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ursinus.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,088 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.ursinus.edu/academics/graduate-pathways-and-partnerships has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.ursinus.edu/apply, whose canonical is https://www.ursinus.edu/admission/applying. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
5 pages without an H1
https://www.ursinus.edu/about, https://www.ursinus.edu/academics, https://www.ursinus.edu/admission, https://www.ursinus.edu/life-at-ursinus and https://www.ursinus.edu/news have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://cdn.curator.io/published-css/bdf6e176-e94a-4a78-89c2-8bf692f19359.css' from origin…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
31 of 32 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 521 words of copy
The homepage carries about 521 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Apply”, “Request Info” and “How can I schedule a campus visit?”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ursinus.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- LiveWhale
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Employees
- 435
- Founded
- 1869
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on ursinus.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.