Website review, no card needed

usafootball.com logo

usafootball.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 84 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on usafootball.com, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
110 ms84 msMay 9Oct 24103 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202687 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 2026102 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 202697 ms
Jul 25, 202696 ms
Aug 1, 202696 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202693 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026107 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026103 ms
Oct 24, 2026103 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of usafootball.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. usafootball.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. usafootball.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. usafootball.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. usafootball.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. usafootball.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. usafootball.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. usafootball.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. usafootball.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix44
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.3 s · 972 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (972 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 490 KiB

    About 490 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google/Doubleclick Ads, Google Tag Manager and FullStory and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 650 ms

    650 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 650 ms of main-thread work and 953 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 460 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 421 ms

    421 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 421 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    280 KiB

    7 images could be 280 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,818 HTML elements

    The page has 1,818 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 44. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    Your largest element takes 19.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Image”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.3 s

    21.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 48% slower for real visitors

    +48%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 815 ms

    815 ms

    Real visitors wait 815 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 498 ms

    498 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 498 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Real visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix43
  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 142 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 142 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (30), scripts 1.3 MB (39) and fonts 466 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    450 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example image at 1,650 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 450 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (683 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9394
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“For you. For the game.” and “Online Shop”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (172 characters)

    Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 15 links with vague text

    15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 474 internal links, 78 external

    The homepage links to 474 pages on usafootball.com and 78 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “USA Football | The Sport's National Governing Body”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://usafootball.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://usafootball.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,315 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 72 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9697
  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    115 of 116 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,145 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,145 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

4 checks passed
  • 32 calls to action

    The homepage has 32 calls to action, for example “Get Started”, “Learn More” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at usafootball.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
2002
Headquarters
Indianapolis

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on usafootball.com, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25