Website review, no card needed
usplastic.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202642 issues · 88 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on usplastic.com, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 75 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 76 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 80 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.5 s
2.3 s
3.0 s
3.8 s
4.5 s
5.3 s
6.1 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.3 s · 871 KiBAbout 871 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 554 KiB39 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (554 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Google CDN and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 560 ms
560 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 663 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,007 HTML elements
The page has 2,007 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google CDN adds 166 ms
166 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 166 ms of main-thread work and 294 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 216 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 31 KiBAbout 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 27 KiB27 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
174 KiB21 images could be 174 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 44 ms
44 msYour server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sThe first text or image appears after 8.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.7 s
17.7 sYour largest element takes 17.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A woman in a warehouse points off-screen”.
Speed Index: 12.9 s
12.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 19.6 s
19.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 982 ms
982 msReal visitors wait 982 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 521 ms
521 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 521 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 75 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 88 ms
88 msReal visitors wait 88 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 258 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 258 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (48), images 919 KiB (144) and stylesheets 58 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (20 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.85 g of CO₂e: 102.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
13 images without alt text
13 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (94 characters)
Your title is 94 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “U.S. Plastic Corp. | Plastic Bottles, Tubing & Fittings, Tanks, Buckets, Pipe, Sheet & La…”.
Meta description is long (240 characters)
Your meta description is 240 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
374 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 374 pages on usplastic.com and 6 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.usplastic.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.usplastic.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,347 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 linked pages hidden from search
/catalog/shoppingcart.aspx, /catalog/default.aspx and /catalog/item.aspx are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/catalog/default.aspx and /catalog/item.aspx all use the title “"0" | U.S. Plastic Corp.”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
/content/catalogrequest.aspx, /catalog/quickorder.aspx, /catalog/shoppingcart.aspx, /catalog/default.aspx, /catalog/newitems.aspx and /catalog/item.aspx have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
/catalog/default.aspx, /catalog/newitems.aspx and /catalog/item.aspx have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5422460&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=7326038c-c1a9-40ce-8ef5-a27b86f3b49c&bo=1&sid=e6ac5730cee311f1abd1c3350a9ea14a&vid=e6ac8cc0cee311f180cf470c1749759e&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
106 of 119 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,089 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,089 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now”.
17 calls to action
The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Quick Order”, “Shop Now” and “Shop All New Products”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
36 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at usplastic.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on usplastic.com, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.