Website review, no card needed
utc.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202646 issues · 88 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on utc.fr, 24 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 156 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 156 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.9 s · 3.9 MB134 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.3 s · 7.8 MBAbout 7.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 6.3 s
6.3 sYouTube costs a phone 6.3 s of main-thread work and 13.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
4.8 s45 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.
Main-thread work: 14.8 s
A phone's processor spends 14.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 27
27/100Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and datatables.net and others), adding 14.2 MB and 6.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 335 KiBAbout 335 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 448 KiB14 images could be 448 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 277 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,258 HTML elements
The page has 2,258 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 143 ms
143 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 143 ms of main-thread work and 346 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 485 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 282 ms
282 msYour server sent the HTML in 282 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.6 s
12.6 sYour largest element takes 12.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 23.0 s
23.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 23.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 92.9 s
92.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 92.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.6 s
3.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 202 ms
202 msReal visitors wait 202 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
24 images without width and height
24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028
0.028The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 18.3 MB in 294 requests
18.3 MBYour homepage downloads 18.3 MB in 294 requests on a phone: scripts 13.0 MB (80), images 2.5 MB (86) and HTML 1.0 MB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (380 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
28 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example divers17.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 175 px. Resized copies would save about 28 KiB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (343 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.2 g of CO₂ per visit
5.19 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.19 g of CO₂e: 622.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
20 tap targets too small
20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (7 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (26 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 26 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
16 links without text
16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 129 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is short (30 characters)
Your meta description is only 30 characters: “Donnons un sens à l'innovation”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
8 H1 headlines
There are 8 <h1> headlines (“Recherchez sur le site”, “Recherchez sur le site” and “Finalistes du 39e Prix Roberval”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
145 internal links, 115 external
The homepage links to 145 pages on utc.fr and 115 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 38 characters
Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Université de technologie de Compiègne”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.utc.fr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.utc.fr/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 1 AI answer engine crawler
1 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.utc.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,959 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.utc.fr/accueil declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
3 pages share a title
/, https://www.utc.fr/en and https://www.utc.fr/accueil all use the title “Université de technologie de Compiègne”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.utc.fr/utc/lutc-en-bref, https://www.utc.fr/transition-ecologique-et-engagement-societal, https://www.utc.fr/utc/lutc-la-ou, https://www.utc.fr/grands-projets-et-operations-immobilieres and https://www.utc.fr/formations/diplome-de-master have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.utc.fr/en and https://www.utc.fr/accueil use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.utc.fr/en, https://www.utc.fr/accueil and https://www.utc.fr/utc/actualites took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
61 of 66 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 765 words of copy
The homepage carries about 765 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 short forms
4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Matomo.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at utc.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Company
- Employees
- 850
- Founded
- 1972
- Headquarters
- Compiègne
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on utc.fr, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.