Website review, no card needed
vanguard.com.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202636 issues · 78 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on vanguard.com.au, 13 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 166 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.6 s
2.1 s
2.6 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 539 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (539 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 314 KiBAbout 314 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 409 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 106 KiB2 images could be 106 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, vgdynamic.info and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 556 KiB and 301 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 7.7 s
7.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.5 s
9.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 357 ms
357 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 357 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 714 ms
714 msReal visitors wait 714 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 166 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
1 image in older formats
1 image (112 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.38 g of CO₂e: 45.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.3 MB in 78 requests
1.3 MBYour homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 78 requests on a phone: scripts 932 KiB (20), images 226 KiB (19) and fonts 95 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (78 characters)
Your title is 78 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Discover a strong & steady future with Vanguard Australia | Vanguard Australia”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
23 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 23 pages on vanguard.com.au and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Our managed funds, ETFs, super and pension accounts, and valuable insights to help make investment simple for investors…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Do you not like money?”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.vanguard.com.au/corporate.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vanguard.com.au/sitemap-corporate.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
18%A phone browser shows 991 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 180. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.vanguard.com.au/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.vanguard.com.au/corporate all use the title “Discover a strong & steady future with Vanguard Australia | Vanguard …”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.vanguard.com.au/institutional/home/en has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 5 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.vanguard.com.au/adviser/home/en, whose canonical is https://www.vanguard.com.au/adviser. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/en/terms-and-conditions, https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/footer/disclaimers, https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/en/privacy, https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/footer/whistleblower-policy, https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/footer/accessibility and https://www.vanguard.com.au/personal/footer/modern-slavery-statement have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.vanguard.com.au/media-centre has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the image 'https://cm.everesttech.net/cm/dd?d_uuid=21431895303540963848748038984372551563' violates the followi…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 991 words of copy
The homepage carries about 991 words of visible text.
Privacy and tracking
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vanguard.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Hosting
- Vanguard
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on vanguard.com.au, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.