Website review, no card needed

vanityfair.com logo

vanityfair.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202619 issues · 76 checks

This review found 19 issues worth fixing on vanityfair.com, 6 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 10.3 MB. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
198 ms170 msMay 16Oct 31180 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026176 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026185 ms
Jun 6, 2026187 ms
Jun 13, 2026188 ms
Jun 20, 2026185 ms
Jun 27, 2026181 ms
Jul 4, 2026181 ms
Jul 11, 2026180 ms
Jul 18, 2026192 ms
Jul 25, 2026195 ms
Aug 1, 2026195 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026177 ms
Aug 22, 2026177 ms
Aug 29, 2026175 ms
Sep 5, 2026179 ms
Sep 12, 2026181 ms
Sep 19, 2026178 ms
Sep 26, 2026177 ms
Oct 3, 2026173 ms
Oct 10, 2026178 ms
Oct 17, 2026179 ms
Oct 24, 2026179 ms
Oct 31, 2026180 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.14

    0.14

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 176 ms to 180 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 760 ms

    760 ms

    Real visitors wait 760 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix38
  • Page weight: 10.3 MB

    10.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.3 MB on a phone, 3.9 MB of it images (37%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 35 images below the first screen load straight away

    35 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.93 g of CO₂e: 352.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fix25
  • 47 images without alt text

    47 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

SEO

1 to fix93
  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Vanity Fair - Entertainment, Politics, and Fashion News | Vanity Fair”.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 86 internal links, 32 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on vanityfair.com and 32 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 80 characters

    Your meta description is 80 characters: “Entertainment, TV, politics, celebrity, fashion, and beauty news and commentary.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Vanity Fair”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vanityfair.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ItemList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vanityfair.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 4 AI answer engine crawlers

    4 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,540 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 12 pages without an H1

    /hollywood, /culture, /news/politics, /style, /style/royals and /hollywood/award-season and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    /style/beauty and /video took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fix71
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=4015762&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=028a6654-d74d-4bdd-975e-8278bb005469&bo=1&sid=a8705650d7e211f1b50e15f4998ecfbe&vid=a870bcb0d7e211f1adc6c3e0e20677b8&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918.

  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 62 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[readmo] Readmo container does not exist!”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (vanityfair.com).

  • Valid certificate (100 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for vanityfair.com and is valid for another 100 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://vanityfair.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 11 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    vanityfair.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    vanityfair.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    vanityfair.com was registered in Mar 1996 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Mar 2027

    vanityfair.com is registered until Mar 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,564 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,564 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SUBSCRIBE” and “Subscribe”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”, “Subscribe” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 89 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_u.vanityfair.com._spf.smart.ondmarc.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 13 trackers load before any consent

    13

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Tag Manager and 8 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 51 cookies set on arrival

    51

    Opening the homepage sets 51 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 88 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 88 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 19 issues on vanityfair.com, including 2 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25