Website review, no card needed
vanitystock.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202626 issues · 80 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on vanitystock.com, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #22,804 of 98,360 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #14,547 of 53,692 online storesbeats 66%
- #14,089 of 48,697 Shopify storesbeats 64%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 113 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 735 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (735 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 549 KiB17 images could be 549 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 981 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,167 HTML elements
The page has 2,167 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 82 ms
82 msShopify costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 613 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Cloudflare and Trust Pilot and others), adding 635 KiB and 97 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
111 KiBAbout 111 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 108 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 181 ms
181 msYour server sent the HTML in 181 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 15.0 s
15.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sYour largest element takes 6.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Pelle spenta e secca dopo l’estate?”.
Time to Interactive: 7.9 s
7.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 989 ms
989 msReal visitors wait 989 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 139 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 107 ms
107 msScripts block the page for only 107 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
eff35f8e-7853-4268-a6b6-73dbd7b10ce0.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
6 images in older formats
6 images (549 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.56 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.56 g of CO₂e: 67.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 121 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 121 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (50), scripts 488 KiB (35) and other files 107 KiB (28). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 74 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Page is set to noindex
The robots meta tag says “noindex, follow, nocache”: Google is told not to list this page at all.
Blocked from indexing
Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
459 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 459 pages on vanitystock.com and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 100 characters
Your meta description is 100 characters: “Discover our selection of beauty, cosmetics and personal care products. Fast shipping across Europe.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “VanityStock - Beauty & Personal Care Products”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “VanityStock - Beauty & Personal Care Products”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vanitystock.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://vanitystock.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,140 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 linked pages hidden from search
https://vanitystock.com/en-de/contacts, https://vanitystock.com/en-de/b2b-contact, https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/discover-the-best-offers-on-vanity-stock, https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/current-promotion, https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/hair-care-on-promotion and https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/mens-care-offers and 9 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://vanitystock.com/en-de and https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/current-promotion all use the title “VanityStock - Beauty & Personal Care Products”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages slow to respond
https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/bundle-and-save and https://vanitystock.com/en-de/collections/vanity-or-premium-deals took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,085 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,085 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop now”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Shop now” and “Subscribe”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vanitystock.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on vanitystock.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.