Website review, no card needed

vans.com.gt logo

vans.com.gt website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202636 issues · 81 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on vans.com.gt, 13 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 47. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 312.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
172 ms113 msMay 16Oct 31159 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026120 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026153 ms
Jul 4, 2026155 ms
Jul 11, 2026155 ms
Jul 18, 2026152 ms
Jul 25, 2026147 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026156 ms
Aug 15, 2026164 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026164 ms
Sep 5, 2026161 ms
Sep 12, 2026161 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026163 ms
Oct 3, 2026165 ms
Oct 10, 2026162 ms
Oct 17, 2026161 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms
Oct 31, 2026159 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vans.com.gt (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vans.com.gt at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. vans.com.gt at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. vans.com.gt at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. vans.com.gt at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. vans.com.gt at 4.4 s4.4 s
  6. vans.com.gt at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. vans.com.gt at 6.1 s6.1 s
  8. vans.com.gt at 7.0 s7.0 s

Speed

12 to fix47
  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,442 HTML elements

    The page has 4,442 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Freshchat, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 411 KiB

    12 images could be 411 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    410 ms · 604 KiB

    About 604 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 410 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 284 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (284 KiB).

  • Freshchat adds 631 ms

    631 ms

    Freshchat costs a phone 631 ms of main-thread work and 728 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 415 ms

    415 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 415 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 344 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Shopify adds 266 ms

    266 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 266 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    90 ms · 52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 90 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Your largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.1 s

    21.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Real visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 462 ms

    462 ms

    Real visitors wait 462 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 212 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 212 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (41), scripts 1.8 MB (93) and other files 565 KiB (46). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    3_2.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 82 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (22 characters)

    Your title is only 22 characters: “Tiendas Vans Guatemala”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 194 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 194 pages on vans.com.gt and 15 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://vans.com.gt/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vans.com.gt/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,704 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://vans.com.gt/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix75
  • 3 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://vans.com.gt/collections/filmore, https://vans.com.gt/collections/hylane and https://vans.com.gt/collections/lowland, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    https://vans.com.gt/collections/knu, https://vans.com.gt/collections/low-pro, https://vans.com.gt/collections/mte, https://vans.com.gt/collections/old-skool, https://vans.com.gt/collections/sandalias and https://vans.com.gt/collections/skate and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 57 small tap targets

    57 of 123 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The following item cannot be handled by the data layer because it does not have a valid format: {"0":"consent","1":"def…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 800 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 800 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call”.

  • 27 short forms

    27 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vans.com.gt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Social Chat Live Chat · Judge Me Reviews · huracdn.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on vans.com.gt, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25