Website review, no card needed

vectorvest.com logo

vectorvest.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202650 issues · 95 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on vectorvest.com, 18 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.0 sMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
212 ms162 msMay 2Oct 17193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026169 ms
May 9, 2026170 ms
May 16, 2026169 ms
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026170 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026175 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026178 ms
Jul 4, 2026179 ms
Jul 11, 2026180 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026182 ms
Aug 1, 2026182 ms
Aug 8, 2026182 ms
Aug 15, 2026181 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026183 ms
Sep 5, 2026191 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026202 ms
Sep 26, 2026206 ms
Oct 3, 2026194 ms
Oct 10, 2026192 ms
Oct 17, 2026193 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vectorvest.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vectorvest.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  2. vectorvest.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  3. vectorvest.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  4. vectorvest.com at 8.4 s8.4 s
  5. vectorvest.com at 10.5 s10.5 s
  6. vectorvest.com at 12.6 s12.6 s
  7. vectorvest.com at 14.7 s14.7 s
  8. vectorvest.com at 16.8 s16.8 s

Speed

14 to fix28
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.0 s · 4.5 MB

    213 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    4.5 s · 1.1 MB

    14 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 205 KiB

    About 205 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 28

    28/100

    Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 55). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 3,133 HTML elements

    The page has 3,133 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, voiceflow.com and Convert Insights and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 964 KiB

    About 964 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 963 ms

    963 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 963 ms of main-thread work and 731 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 377 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • voiceflow.com adds 296 ms

    296 ms

    voiceflow.com costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 581 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 118 ms

    118 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 118 ms of main-thread work and 424 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    75 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 75 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 55 but mobile only 28. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 40 ms

    40 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 39.3 s

    39.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 39.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.107

    0.107

    The layout shifts by 0.107 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 193 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 6.2 MB in 305 requests

    6.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 305 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (144), images 1.9 MB (69) and fonts 1.1 MB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (994 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    197 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example US-Device-Image.gif at 1,685 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 197 KiB.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.77 g of CO₂e: 211.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 11 images without alt text

    11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Protect & grow your stock portfolio in only 10 mi…”, “NASDAQ Powered Data. VectorVest Trusted Results.” and “Unlock the power of real-time data”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 74 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on vectorvest.com and 28 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Stock Analysis & Portfolio Management System that tells you when to buy stocks, what to buy, and when to sell. It's tha…”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “VectorVest: Stock Analysis & Forecasting Software”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vectorvest.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vectorvest.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vectorvest.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,084 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.vectorvest.com/profitlocker-pro has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.vectorvest.com/vvrobotrader has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

6 to fixGoogle 3168
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=25069188&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=6d52a94e-dfbc-4dc9-becc-e1c19954cf0b&bo=1&sid=866eaae0ccbc11f18df067e5666b7e29&vid=866ed300ccbc11f1868b8349c1983aea&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • About 5,233 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 5,233 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start My Risk-Free 30-Day Trial”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Pricing” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 46 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 3 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 35 cookies set on arrival

    35

    Opening the homepage sets 35 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 57 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vectorvest.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on vectorvest.com, including 25 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25