Website review, no card needed
veimia.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 86 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on veimia.com, 14 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 61.2 MB in 335 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #71,453 of 108,117 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #45,445 of 61,284 online storesbeats 22%
- #42,963 of 55,893 Shopify storesbeats 19%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 240 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 255 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 327 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 8.0 s
A phone's processor spends 8.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
5,107 HTML elements
The page has 5,107 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Clarity and Smart Insight Tracking and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Shopify adds 697 ms
697 msShopify costs a phone 697 ms of main-thread work and 735 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 240 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (240 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
375 KiBAbout 375 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
351 KiB14 images could be 351 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 80 KiBAbout 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 202 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 31 ms
31 msYour server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.6 s
16.6 sYour largest element takes 16.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 25.1 s
25.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 203 ms
203 msReal visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 240 ms to 327 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 466 ms
466 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 466 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 656 ms
656 msReal visitors wait 656 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 61.2 MB in 335 requests
61.2 MBYour homepage downloads 61.2 MB in 335 requests on a phone: media 55.6 MB (21), fonts 2.0 MB (1) and images 1.4 MB (58). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
2_6e6f2201-e783-4f04-9b6a-dd1e92e05553.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 17.3 g of CO₂ per visit
17.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 17.35 g of CO₂e: 2081.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
20 buttons without a name
20 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
44 tap targets too small
44 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
41 text elements with low contrast
41 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
17 images without alt text
17 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (68 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 68 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
33 links without text
33 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
351 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 351 pages on veimia.com and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 124 characters
Your meta description is 124 characters: “ヴェーミア・VEIMIAは「自分を愛する瞬間を」を掲げる女性下着ブランドです。主な製品は、胸を小さく見せるブラをはじめ、ランジェリー、ショーツ(パンティ)、下着セット、ガードル(補正下着)、キャミソール、ナイトブラ、授乳ブラ、ボディウェア…”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “VEIMIA【公式】・ヴェーミア通販サイト-ブラジャー・下着・ 小さく見せるブラの革命児”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.veimia.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.veimia.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (567 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.veimia.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.veimia.com/collections/pull-on-bras has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 9 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, whose canonical is https://www.veimia.com/collections/%e3%83%96%e3%83%a9. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E5%B0%8F%E3%81%95%E3%81%8F%E8%A6%8B%E3%81%9B%E3%82%8B%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E5%A4%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%84%E3%82%B5%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/kyouseibura, https://www.veimia.com/collections/supportive-bras and https://www.veimia.com/collections/pull-on-bras and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 pages with very little text
https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%81%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%83%96%E3%83%88%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E5%9E%8B, https://www.veimia.com/collections/maeakibura, https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%82%B9%E3%83%9D%E3%83%BC%E3%83%84%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/jyutugobura and https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E6%8E%88%E4%B9%B3%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%83%88%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%81%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC%E3%83%96%E3%83%88%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E5%9E%8B, https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E3%83%AC%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B9%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9, https://www.veimia.com/collections/maeakibura, https://www.veimia.com/collections/jyutugobura and https://www.veimia.com/collections/%E6%8E%88%E4%B9%B3%E3%83%96%E3%83%A9 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 115 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.veimia.com/.
21 small tap targets
21 of 46 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Only about 211 words
The homepage has only about 211 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 126 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
43 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at veimia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on veimia.com, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.