Website review, no card needed

verily.com logo

verily.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202624 issues · 75 checks

This review found 24 issues worth fixing on verily.com, 4 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 312.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
163 ms86 msMay 16Oct 31154 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026106 ms
May 30, 2026107 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026101 ms
Jun 20, 2026102 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026111 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026110 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 202699 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026111 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026121 ms
Oct 3, 2026116 ms
Oct 10, 2026122 ms
Oct 17, 2026133 ms
Oct 24, 2026140 ms
Oct 31, 2026154 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of verily.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. verily.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. verily.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. verily.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. verily.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. verily.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. verily.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. verily.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. verily.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

5 to fix87
  • Mobile performance score: 87

    87/100

    Your mobile performance score is 87. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 289 KiB

    About 289 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 3.7 MB and 170 ms of main-thread time.

  • vercel-storage.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    vercel-storage.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 3.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    153 KiB

    About 153 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 131 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    76 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (76 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 729 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 35% slower for real visitors

    +35%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 34% slower for real visitors

    +34%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 198 ms

    198 ms

    Real visitors wait 198 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 596 ms

    596 ms

    Real visitors wait 596 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “The building blocks of precision health”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 138 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 129 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 129 requests on a phone: media 3.3 MB (2), scripts 1.4 MB (98) and fonts 206 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 176.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 98100
  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Meta description is long (176 characters)

    Your meta description is 176 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 23 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 23 pages on verily.com and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The building blocks of precision health”.

  • Title: 42 characters

    Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Verily Health | AI-native precision health”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://verily.com/home.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.verily.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://verily.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (317 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://verily.com/privacy-policy, https://verily.com/terms, https://verily.com/responsible-supply-chain and https://verily.com/consumer-health-data-privacy-policy use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://verily.com/about-us/careers, whose canonical is https://verily.com/careers. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://verily.com/accessibility, https://verily.com/privacy-policy, https://verily.com/terms and https://verily.com/consumer-health-data-privacy-policy have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages with very little text

    https://verily.com/accessibility, https://verily.com/privacy-policy, https://verily.com/terms, https://verily.com/responsible-supply-chain and https://verily.com/consumer-health-data-privacy-policy have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://verily.com/newsroom took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix71
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 166 words

    The homepage has only about 166 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at verily.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Founded
2015
Headquarters
San Francisco

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 24 issues on verily.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25