Website review, no card needed

vfb.de logo

vfb.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202645 issues · 89 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on vfb.de, 16 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
129 ms97 msMay 9Oct 24120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026111 ms
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026108 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026102 ms
Jun 20, 2026101 ms
Jun 27, 2026103 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026108 ms
Jul 18, 2026109 ms
Jul 25, 2026115 ms
Aug 1, 2026119 ms
Aug 8, 2026119 ms
Aug 15, 2026123 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026122 ms
Sep 5, 2026125 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026122 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026122 ms
Oct 10, 2026120 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms
Oct 24, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vfb.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vfb.de at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. vfb.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. vfb.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. vfb.de at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. vfb.de at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. vfb.de at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. vfb.de at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. vfb.de at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

13 to fix40
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.8 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    6.8 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.4 s · 1.1 MB

    138 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 s · 594 KiB

    23 images could be 594 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.1 s · 224 KiB

    224 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (consentmanager.net, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.1 MB and 800 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    850 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 110 KiB

    About 110 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • consentmanager.net adds 333 ms

    333 ms

    consentmanager.net costs a phone 333 ms of main-thread work and 147 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 275 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,066 HTML elements

    The page has 2,066 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    7 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    Your largest element takes 22.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies and similar technologies to technically oper…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.3 s

    23.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 582 ms

    582 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 582 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.101

    0.101

    The layout shifts by 0.101 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Real visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 367 ms

    367 ms

    Real visitors wait 367 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB in 162 requests

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 162 requests on a phone: images 3.9 MB (125), scripts 1.7 MB (14) and stylesheets 112 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    102 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Jubel_LEV-Fans_00000_fr_1168x657.jpeg at 1,168 px wide, shown at 344 px. Resized copies would save about 102 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (122 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8490
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 110 images without alt text

    110 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (120 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 120 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Table header text should not be empty (4 elements)

    Table header text should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.

    <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8380
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 199 internal links, 52 external

    The homepage links to 199 pages on vfb.de and 52 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “vfb.de Im offiziellen Webauftritt des VfB Stuttgart gibt es alle News und Infos zum fünffachen Deutschen Meister, den S…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “VfB Stuttgart | Offizielle Webseite des VfB Stuttgart”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vfb.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vfb.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (799 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.vfb.de/de all use the title “VfB Stuttgart | Offizielle Webseite des VfB Stuttgart”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    https://www.vfb.de/de, https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/aktuell/vfb-magazine/magazine/stadion-aktuell, https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/aktuell/news-archiv, https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/profis/kader/saisonen/2026-2027/kader, https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/profis/kader/saisonen/2026-2027/listenansicht and https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/profis/kader/saisonen/2026-2027/statistik and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.vfb.de/de, https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/aktuell/neues and https://www.vfb.de/de/1893/aktuell/news-archiv have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 141 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8885
  • 26 small tap targets

    26 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “WebSocket connection to 'wss://aws.mycrocast.de:20022/mqtt' failed: Establishing a tunnel via proxy server failed.”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 674 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 674 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “SHOP” and “Shop”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vfb.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Bremen Briteline GmbH

Company

Founded
1893
Headquarters
Stuttgart

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on vfb.de, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25