Website review, no card needed

vicomte-a.com logo

vicomte-a.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202631 issues · 81 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on vicomte-a.com, 12 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
182 ms106 msMay 2Oct 17129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026115 ms
May 9, 2026116 ms
May 16, 2026120 ms
May 23, 2026123 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026135 ms
Jul 11, 2026142 ms
Jul 18, 2026153 ms
Jul 25, 2026173 ms
Aug 1, 2026164 ms
Aug 8, 2026156 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026135 ms
Aug 29, 2026136 ms
Sep 5, 2026131 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026131 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vicomte-a.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vicomte-a.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. vicomte-a.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. vicomte-a.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. vicomte-a.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. vicomte-a.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. vicomte-a.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. vicomte-a.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. vicomte-a.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

7 to fix64
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • 3,314 HTML elements

    The page has 3,314 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 235 KiB

    About 235 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    298 KiB

    6 images could be 298 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Klaviyo adds 162 ms

    162 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 162 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Optanon and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 799 KiB and 448 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 154 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    68 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (68 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    16 KiB

    About 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 55 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Your largest element takes 8.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 167 ms

    167 ms

    Real visitors wait 167 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 529 ms

    529 ms

    Real visitors wait 529 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 89 ms

    89 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 89 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 299 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 299 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (36), other files 966 KiB (141) and scripts 846 KiB (82). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    IW_HP042_P01khakiA.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (147 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.03 g of CO₂e: 123.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8791
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (169 characters)

    Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 200 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 200 pages on vicomte-a.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Vêtements Chics & Haut de Gamme | Homme - Femme – Vicomte A”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://vicomte-a.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vicomte-a.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (921 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://vicomte-a.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix67
  • 1 page without a title

    https://vicomte-a.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://vicomte-a.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://vicomte-a.com/collections/all, https://vicomte-a.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://vicomte-a.com/collections/remises-homme, https://vicomte-a.com/collections/homme-remises-offres-speciales-blazers, https://vicomte-a.com/collections/homme-remises-offres-speciales-pulls and https://vicomte-a.com/collections/homme-remise-offres-speciales-polos and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://vicomte-a.com/collections/homme-remise-offres-speciales-pantalons and https://vicomte-a.com/collections/homme-remise-offres-speciales-bermudas-maillots-de-bain use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://vicomte-a.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 452 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 452 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “[email protected]”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Pinterest Tag and Snap Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vicomte-a.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Taverny

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on vicomte-a.com, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25