Website review, no card needed

vietmap.vn logo

vietmap.vn website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202645 issues · 94 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on vietmap.vn, 18 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
114 ms88 msMay 2Oct 17111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202691 ms
May 16, 202693 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202695 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202697 ms
Aug 8, 2026100 ms
Aug 15, 2026101 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026106 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026108 ms
Sep 26, 2026108 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vietmap.vn (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vietmap.vn at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. vietmap.vn at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. vietmap.vn at 3.5 s3.5 s
  4. vietmap.vn at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. vietmap.vn at 5.8 s5.8 s
  6. vietmap.vn at 6.9 s6.9 s
  7. vietmap.vn at 8.1 s8.1 s
  8. vietmap.vn at 9.2 s9.2 s

Speed

10 to fix20
  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 1.3 MB

    14 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 327 KiB

    About 327 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 20

    20/100

    Your mobile performance score is 20 (desktop: 39). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 382 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (382 KiB).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 798 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and openai.com and others), adding 2.9 MB and 462 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • dktcdn.net adds 8 ms

    8 ms

    dktcdn.net costs a phone 8 ms of main-thread work and 2.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 217 ms

    217 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 217 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.71

    0.71

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.71 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Your largest element takes 13.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.692

    0.692

    The layout shifts by 0.692 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.1 s

    14.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 661 ms

    661 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 661 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 453 ms

    453 ms

    Real visitors wait 453 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.2 MB in 73 requests

    3.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 73 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (32), scripts 738 KiB (19) and fonts 158 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 109.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fix59
  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 23 text elements with low contrast

    23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

    ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (2 elements).

  • ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

    ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names (1 element).

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (1 element).

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 83 internal links, 38 external

    The homepage links to 83 pages on vietmap.vn and 38 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “VIETMAP - VIETMAP Cty CP ứng dụng bản đồ Việt chuyên cung cấp các sản phẩm thiết bị GPS dẫn đường, camera hành trình, p…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “VIETMAP JSC - Công Ty Cổ Phần Ứng Dụng Bản Đồ Việt”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://vietmap.vn/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: LocalBusiness and Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vietmap.vn/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,054 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://vietmap.vn/gioi-thieu-map and https://vietmap.vn/collections/all have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://vietmap.vn/collections/all has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 pages slow to respond

    https://vietmap.vn/gioi-thieu, https://vietmap.vn/gioi-thieu-map, https://vietmap.vn/collections/all, https://vietmap.vn/camera-hanh-trinh, https://vietmap.vn/thiet-bi-dan-duong-gps and https://vietmap.vn/man-hinh-giai-tri-oto and 7 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix72
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 735 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 735 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vietmap.vn, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on vietmap.vn, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25