Website review, no card needed

vingino.com logo

vingino.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202639 issues · 85 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on vingino.com, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 45. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.1 sMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
219 ms122 msMay 2Oct 17208 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026135 ms
May 9, 2026133 ms
May 16, 2026134 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026155 ms
Jun 6, 2026162 ms
Jun 13, 2026175 ms
Jun 20, 2026169 ms
Jun 27, 2026167 ms
Jul 4, 2026169 ms
Jul 11, 2026163 ms
Jul 18, 2026167 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026159 ms
Aug 8, 2026169 ms
Aug 15, 2026171 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026183 ms
Sep 5, 2026180 ms
Sep 12, 2026183 ms
Sep 19, 2026186 ms
Sep 26, 2026188 ms
Oct 3, 2026199 ms
Oct 10, 2026204 ms
Oct 17, 2026208 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vingino.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vingino.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. vingino.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. vingino.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. vingino.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. vingino.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. vingino.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. vingino.com at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. vingino.com at 9.0 s9.0 s

Speed

9 to fix45
  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5,645 HTML elements

    The page has 5,645 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 587 KiB

    About 587 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 428 KiB

    11 images could be 428 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 1.2 MB and 513 ms of main-thread time.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 616 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Shopify adds 76 ms

    76 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 76 ms of main-thread work and 628 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 85 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (85 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 39 KiB

    About 39 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 73 ms

    73 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 73 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.9 s

    22.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 791 ms

    791 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 791 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 250 ms

    250 ms

    Real visitors wait 250 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 54% slower for real visitors

    +54%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 208 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.9 MB in 360 requests

    4.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 360 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (36), scripts 1.4 MB (90) and other files 1.3 MB (206). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (70 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.39 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.39 g of CO₂e: 166.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8488
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 links without text

    22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 81 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 63 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10088
  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “The making of icons - Vingino”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (216 characters)

    Your meta description is 216 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 295 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 295 pages on vingino.com and 15 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “vingino”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vingino.com/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vingino.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (967 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.vingino.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/nieuwe-collectie, https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/alle-jongenskleding, https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/alle-jongens-jeans, https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/alle-jongens-jassen, https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/alle-jongens-t-shirts-polos and https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/alle-jongens-broeken and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/nieuwe-collectie and https://www.vingino.com/en/collections/jongens-kleding have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 132 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 395 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 395 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop now”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Subscribe” and “Shop now”.

  • 182 short forms

    182 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vingino.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on vingino.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25