Website review, no card needed
visionrt.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202636 issues · 83 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on visionrt.com, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 178 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.7 s · 3.0 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.5 s · 850 KiB5 images could be 850 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.2 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and Civic and others), adding 1.8 MB and 682 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 360 ms
360 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 516 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Vimeo adds 121 ms
121 msVimeo costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 175 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
58 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.8 s
5.8 sReal visitors wait 5.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.3 s
5.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.0 s
16.0 sYour largest element takes 16.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 13.8 s
13.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.3 s
21.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 55% slower for real visitors
+55%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 5.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 347 ms
347 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 347 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 178 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 180 ms
180 msReal visitors wait 180 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.9 MB in 102 requests
4.9 MBYour homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 102 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (22), scripts 2.0 MB (32) and fonts 204 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images in older formats
8 images (924 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (728 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
5 images far larger than shown
52 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example SimRT.jpg at 900 px wide, shown at 294 px. Resized copies would save about 52 KiB.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.38 g of CO₂e: 165.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
42 images without alt text
42 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
100 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 100 pages on visionrt.com and 22 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Vision RT is the inventor of Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) and produces a range of innovative radiotherapy so…”.
Title: 37 characters
Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Vision RT | Innovative SGRT Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://visionrt.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.visionrt.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://visionrt.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,234 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages without an H1
https://visionrt.com/contact-us, https://visionrt.com/introduction-to-sgrt, https://visionrt.com/getting-started-with-sgrt and https://visionrt.com/sgrtaccess have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages slow to respond
https://visionrt.com/about-us, https://visionrt.com/contact-us, https://visionrt.com/leadership, https://visionrt.com/news, https://visionrt.com/introduction-to-sgrt and https://visionrt.com/getting-started-with-sgrt and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 788 words of copy
The homepage carries about 788 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact / Careers”, “Contact Us” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 3 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at visionrt.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on visionrt.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.