Website review, no card needed

vivi.io logo

vivi.io website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202639 issues · 86 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on vivi.io, 14 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
250 ms157 msMay 9Oct 24222 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026168 ms
May 16, 2026176 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026213 ms
Jun 6, 2026214 ms
Jun 13, 2026215 ms
Jun 20, 2026217 ms
Jun 27, 2026195 ms
Jul 4, 2026212 ms
Jul 11, 2026190 ms
Jul 18, 2026183 ms
Jul 25, 2026178 ms
Aug 1, 2026171 ms
Aug 8, 2026199 ms
Aug 15, 2026220 ms
Aug 22, 2026239 ms
Aug 29, 2026238 ms
Sep 5, 2026224 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026205 ms
Sep 26, 2026200 ms
Oct 3, 2026205 ms
Oct 10, 2026212 ms
Oct 17, 2026220 ms
Oct 24, 2026222 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vivi.io (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vivi.io at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. vivi.io at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. vivi.io at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. vivi.io at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. vivi.io at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. vivi.io at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. vivi.io at 6.3 s6.3 s
  8. vivi.io at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

11 to fix30
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 678 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.8 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 679 KiB

    About 679 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 561 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 483 ms

    483 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 223 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    439 KiB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (439 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    260 KiB

    7 images could be 260 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • tidio.co adds 135 ms

    135 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    Your largest element takes 12.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “One platform for crisis response, campus communications, an…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.5 s

    24.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 252 ms

    252 ms

    Real visitors wait 252 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 168 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 786 ms

    786 ms

    Real visitors wait 786 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 5.8 MB in 235 requests

    5.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 235 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (83), scripts 2.0 MB (56) and fonts 344 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    emergency_announcement_600w-1.gif weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (167 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 196.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8994
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (54 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h3 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • Title is short (11 characters)

    Your title is only 11 characters: “Home - Vivi”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Structured data has 8 problems

    Structured data found (Article, BreadcrumbList, ImageObject and ItemList) but with 8 problems, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 19 links with vague text

    19 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 112 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 112 pages on vivi.io and 10 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “More than wireless screen mirroring and digital signage, Vivi drives classroom engagement, builds community, and suppor…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Vivi is the essential operating system for schools.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vivi.io/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vivi.io/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vivi.io/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,995 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.vivi.io/blog has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.vivi.io/how-it-works has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 65 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9276
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=148007322&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=657c0366-77d0-424b-91d5-e9e27d8a5206&bo=1&sid=0f53b1d0d38a11f1be74a7b816a11722&vid=0f53d5b0d38a11f1a060a1cd857b6111&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 402 ()”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 865 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 865 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REQUEST A DEMO” and “Request a Demo”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Request a Demo” and “Learn More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 30 cookies set on arrival

    30

    Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 48 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vivi.io, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
WP Engine

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on vivi.io, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
vivi.io website review: scores and fixes | Programmable