Website review, no card needed

voiron.fr logo

voiron.fr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202636 issues · 84 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on voiron.fr, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s889 msMay 2Oct 171.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026982 ms
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.0 s
Jun 13, 2026982 ms
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 2026965 ms
Aug 29, 2026959 ms
Sep 5, 2026943 ms
Sep 12, 2026929 ms
Sep 19, 2026939 ms
Sep 26, 2026960 ms
Oct 3, 2026980 ms
Oct 10, 2026995 ms
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms93 msMay 2Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202694 ms
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202697 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 202698 ms
Jul 25, 202698 ms
Aug 1, 202699 ms
Aug 8, 202698 ms
Aug 15, 202699 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of voiron.fr (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. voiron.fr at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. voiron.fr at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. voiron.fr at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. voiron.fr at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. voiron.fr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. voiron.fr at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. voiron.fr at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. voiron.fr at 4.2 s4.2 s

Speed

9 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.0 s · 2.5 MB

    60 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 856 KiB

    10 images could be 856 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    2.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.1 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    420 ms · 104 KiB

    About 104 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 420 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 212 KiB

    About 212 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 21 ms

    21 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 21 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • apidae-tourisme.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    apidae-tourisme.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Amazon Web Services, eolas-services.com and yelda.ai and others), adding 817 KiB and 42 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 98 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 59. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 304 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.287

    0.287

    The layout shifts by 0.287 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Real visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 464 ms

    464 ms

    Real visitors wait 464 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 24 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 67 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 67 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (29), scripts 471 KiB (15) and fonts 275 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (644 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    250 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example SIT_VOIRON_870_accueilVoiron.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 250 KiB.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.82 g of CO₂e: 98.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9192
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 23 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 86 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on voiron.fr and 15 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 113 characters

    Your meta description is 113 characters: “Retrouvez tous les services, démarches, infos pratiques, actualités, événements et projets de la Ville de Voiron.”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Site officiel - Mairie de Voiron”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.voiron.fr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.voiron.fr/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.voiron.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (877 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.voiron.fr/1066-commercant.htm, https://www.voiron.fr/1067-habitant.htm and https://www.voiron.fr/1144-stationnement.htm have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 893 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 893 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at voiron.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on voiron.fr, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25