Website review, no card needed

voloom.com logo

voloom.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202643 issues · 81 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on voloom.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s1.4 sMay 16Oct 312.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
175 ms134 msMay 16Oct 31148 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026142 ms
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026148 ms
Jun 13, 2026153 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026145 ms
Jul 18, 2026140 ms
Jul 25, 2026139 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026154 ms
Aug 15, 2026157 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026161 ms
Sep 5, 2026165 ms
Sep 12, 2026164 ms
Sep 19, 2026166 ms
Sep 26, 2026170 ms
Oct 3, 2026163 ms
Oct 10, 2026166 ms
Oct 17, 2026163 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms
Oct 31, 2026148 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of voloom.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. voloom.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. voloom.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. voloom.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. voloom.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. voloom.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  6. voloom.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  7. voloom.com at 8.6 s8.6 s
  8. voloom.com at 9.8 s9.8 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 5.6 MB

    47 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 550 KiB

    About 550 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (web.app, Facebook and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.3 MB and 987 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 201 KiB

    6 images could be 201 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 60 KiB

    About 60 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 40 KiB

    40 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Klaviyo adds 184 ms

    184 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 184 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 128 ms

    128 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 128 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 235 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 59 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.7 s

    12.7 s

    Your largest element takes 12.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.8 s

    19.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.5 s

    12.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 461 ms

    461 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 461 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 142 ms to 148 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Real visitors wait 133 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 670 ms

    670 ms

    Real visitors wait 670 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 21.2 MB in 440 requests

    21.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.2 MB in 440 requests on a phone: media 17.1 MB (11), other files 1.6 MB (277) and scripts 1.5 MB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    mobile_16.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    103 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 2_Mesa_de_trabajo_1.png at 4,500 px wide, shown at 26 px. Resized copies would save about 103 KiB.

  • About 6.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.01 g of CO₂e: 720.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 36 images without alt text

    36 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “VOLOOM”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 49 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 49 pages on voloom.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 102 characters

    Your meta description is 102 characters: “VOLOOM is THE FIRST HAIR VOLUMIZING IRON, and it was designed specifically to add huge volume to hair.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://voloom.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://voloom.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (346 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://voloom.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://voloom.com/collections/all-products, https://voloom.com/collections/hair-volumizing-tools, https://voloom.com/pages/product-quiz, https://voloom.com/pages/video-tips, https://voloom.com/pages/voloom-technology and https://voloom.com/pages/faq and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://voloom.com/pages/how-to-use-1, https://voloom.com/pages/transformations, https://voloom.com/pages/video-tips, https://voloom.com/pages/voloom-technology, https://voloom.com/pages/faq and https://voloom.com/pages/our-story have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://lantern.roeye.com/track.php?fingerprint=e6b45bf0-a57a-401b-a828-c9b97efc2e5c&referrer=&landingpage=https%3A%2F%2Fvoloom.com%2F&useragent=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(iPhone%3B%20CPU%20iPhone%20OS%2017_5%2.

  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: “Over 100,000 Happy Customers”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 204 words

    The homepage has only about 204 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Sign up” and “Contact Us”.

  • 7 short forms

    7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 35 cookies set on arrival

    35

    Opening the homepage sets 35 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 63 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 63 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at voloom.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 23 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Intelligems A B Testing · Triplewhale · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Seal Subscriptions · Cartix · Awin Affiliate Marketing · Prod Master Fad8e300 · Applovin Shop Integration · gethypervisual.com · crazyegg.com · hulkapps.com · goaffpro.com · nfcube.com · arhamcommerce.com · getredo.com · revenuehunt.com · hextom.com · cloudfront.net · wetracked.io · teq9.com · amazonaws.com · retention.com · influencer-hero.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
San Francisco

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on voloom.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25