Website review, no card needed

voyagertechnologies.com logo

voyagertechnologies.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202629 issues · 84 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on voyagertechnologies.com, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s965 msApr 25Oct 101.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.3 s
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms83 msApr 25Oct 1097 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202696 ms
May 2, 202696 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202688 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202688 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202688 ms
Jul 18, 202690 ms
Jul 25, 202688 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202686 ms
Aug 15, 202685 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202692 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of voyagertechnologies.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. voyagertechnologies.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. voyagertechnologies.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. voyagertechnologies.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. voyagertechnologies.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. voyagertechnologies.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. voyagertechnologies.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. voyagertechnologies.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. voyagertechnologies.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

8 to fix56
  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 s · 3.2 MB

    16 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.1 s · 594 KiB

    About 594 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 193 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (193 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 87). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and reddit and others), adding 1.3 MB and 592 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 252 ms

    252 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 252 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 153 ms

    153 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 153 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    280 ms · 64 KiB

    About 64 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 280 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 83 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 87 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.8 s

    19.8 s

    Your largest element takes 19.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ACCELERATING THE ADVANTAGE”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.2 s

    20.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 493 ms

    493 ms

    Real visitors wait 493 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 30 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 85 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (21), scripts 1.3 MB (23) and other files 383 KiB (28). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2bffe8c626ce338d1c2de7c5131b7acb856067ef.png at 2,464 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 15 images below the first screen load straight away

    15 images further down the page (3.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (1.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.73 g of CO₂e: 207.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9999
  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 1 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8576
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Home | Voyager Technologies”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Accelerating the Advantage” and “Innovate. Enable. Defend.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 69 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on voyagertechnologies.com and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://voyagertechnologies.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: LocalBusiness, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://voyagertechnologies.com/sitemaps.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://voyagertechnologies.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (823 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-story, https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-team, https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-customers, https://voyagertechnologies.com/strategic-systems, https://voyagertechnologies.com/lunar-systems and https://voyagertechnologies.com/advanced-electronics and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-story, https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-team and https://voyagertechnologies.com/our-customers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://voyagertechnologies.com/air, https://voyagertechnologies.com/land and https://voyagertechnologies.com/space have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 729 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 729 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Join Our team” and “Sign up”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at voyagertechnologies.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Hiring

Hiring
181 open roles
Teams
Mfg & Production Operations (35), Systems Engineering (13), Bus Ops (12), Mechanical Engineering (9)
Job board
greenhouse

Company

Founded
2025
Headquarters
Denver

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on voyagertechnologies.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25