Website review, no card needed
vstepsimulation.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202649 issues · 106 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on vstepsimulation.com, 19 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused CSS. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63D- #83,815 of 88,254 reviewed websitesbeats 4%
- #44,737 of 45,779 online storesbeats 2%
- #2,024 of 2,152 WooCommerce storesbeats 5%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 9.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 9.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 10.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 10.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 10.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 10.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 10.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 9.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 6.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 282 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 301 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 370 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 402 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 471 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 634 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 779 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 880 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 911 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 731 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 665 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 497 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 410 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 369 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 350 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused CSS
26.9 s · 5.1 MBAbout 5.1 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 26.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
28.1 s42 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 28.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.0 s · 705 KiBAbout 705 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 30). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.8 s
A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,193 HTML elements
The page has 3,193 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 863 ms
863 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 863 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 495 ms
495 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 495 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 364 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
Improve image delivery
346 KiB5 images could be 346 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 208 ms
208 msYour server sent the HTML in 208 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.28
0.28For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 29.3 s
29.3 sThe first text or image appears after 29.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 45.9 s
45.9 sYour largest element takes 45.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 29.3 s
29.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 29.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 46.2 s
46.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.418
0.418The layout shifts by 0.418 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 251 ms
251 msReal visitors wait 251 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 251 ms
251 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 251 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 282 ms to 350 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 741 ms
741 msReal visitors wait 741 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 36% faster for real visitors
-36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.4 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.4 MB in 159 requests
9.4 MBYour homepage downloads 9.4 MB in 159 requests on a phone: stylesheets 5.2 MB (44), images 1.8 MB (49) and scripts 1.7 MB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images far larger than shown
436 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Schermafbeelding-2025-12-03-om-14.48.30-scaled.png.webp at 2,048 px wide, shown at 343 px. Resized copies would save about 436 KiB.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (619 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.66 g of CO₂e: 318.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
20 text elements with low contrast
20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (10 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links look like plain text
3 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
19 images without alt text
19 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
41 links with vague text
41 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
10 H1 headlines
There are 10 <h1> headlines (“LEARNING BY SIMULATION”, “VSTEP enables learning by simulation” and “TRAINING GOALS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
138 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 138 pages on vstepsimulation.com and 7 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “Maritime simulators for professional training and home use: DNV-certified NAUTIS bridge and ship handling simulation, p…”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “VSTEP Enables Learning by Simulation - maritime simulators”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://vstepsimulation.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vstepsimulation.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,765 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (4 KiB, 28 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/order-request-list is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
/order-request-list has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
/order-request-list, /nautis-simulator, /portable-simulator, /nautis-visualiser, /nautis-home and /training-needs and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/vstepsimulation.bsky.social (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (vstepsimulation.com).
Valid certificate (87 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for vstepsimulation.com and is valid for another 87 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://vstepsimulation.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
vstepsimulation.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
vstepsimulation.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 16 years old
16 yearsvstepsimulation.com was registered in Oct 2010 through Key-Systems GmbH. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2027
vstepsimulation.com is registered until Oct 2027.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 20-field form
Your longest form asks for 20 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,996 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,996 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
41 calls to action
The homepage has 41 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “BOOK A DEMO” and “LEARN MORE”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be vstepsimulation.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:77.75.48.117 ip6:2a00:5140:ed04:1117:0:0:0:1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com inc…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “k2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 2002
- Headquarters
- Rotterdam
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 49 issues on vstepsimulation.com, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.