Website review, no card needed
wakelet.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202632 issues · 99 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on wakelet.com, 10 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 570 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 584 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 595 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 591 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 559 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 526 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 514 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 492 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 502 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 491 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 464 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 488 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 469 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 482 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 487 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 469 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 478 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 498 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 523 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 525 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 514 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 499 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 479 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 490 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 522 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.6 s · 899 KiBAbout 899 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 2.7 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
540 ms · 177 KiBAbout 177 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 540 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 646 ms
646 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 646 ms of main-thread work and 651 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 595 ms
595 msYouTube costs a phone 595 ms of main-thread work and 973 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
378 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (378 KiB).
Facebook adds 303 ms
303 msFacebook costs a phone 303 ms of main-thread work and 221 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
website-files.com adds 233 ms
233 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 233 ms of main-thread work and 616 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 276 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
273 KiB10 images could be 273 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 66 but mobile only 38. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s
11.3 sYour largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “All your content, beautifully organized.”.
First Contentful Paint: 7.3 s
7.3 sThe first text or image appears after 7.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 874 ms
874 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 874 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 203 ms
203 msReal visitors wait 203 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 844 ms
844 msReal visitors wait 844 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
57 images without width and height
57 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 570 ms to 522 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 89 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 89 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (27), images 542 KiB (31) and stylesheets 134 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.79 g of CO₂e: 95.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 65 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 0 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage, Organization, SoftwareApplication and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.
52 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 52 pages on wakelet.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Wakelet is the all-in-one platform for curating, organising and sharing content. Build collections for your classroom, …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “All your content,beautifully organized.”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Wakelet | Save, Organise and Share Content in Collections”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wakelet.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wakelet.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (558 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (10 KiB, 32 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 third-party cookies
6 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/company/wakelet-limited/ (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (wakelet.com).
Valid certificate (167 days left)
The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for wakelet.com and is valid for another 167 days.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://wakelet.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 62 days
wakelet.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
wakelet.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
2 checks passed
Domain is 15 years old
15 yearswakelet.com was registered in Dec 2010 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
DNSSEC is on
wakelet.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 30 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 479 words of copy
The homepage carries about 479 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join a collection” and “Sign up for free!”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Sign up” and “Join a collection”.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be wakelet.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:evmailer.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
33 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 32 issues on wakelet.com, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.