Website review, no card needed

wallhang.com.tr logo

wallhang.com.tr website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202632 issues · 79 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on wallhang.com.tr, 9 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s748 msMay 16Oct 311.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026974 ms
May 23, 2026972 ms
May 30, 2026969 ms
Jun 6, 2026946 ms
Jun 13, 2026897 ms
Jun 20, 2026891 ms
Jun 27, 2026879 ms
Jul 4, 2026894 ms
Jul 11, 2026971 ms
Jul 18, 20261.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
173 ms82 msMay 16Oct 31149 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 202697 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202694 ms
Jun 20, 202692 ms
Jun 27, 202692 ms
Jul 4, 202692 ms
Jul 11, 202699 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026107 ms
Aug 8, 2026105 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026117 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026142 ms
Sep 12, 2026157 ms
Sep 19, 2026162 ms
Sep 26, 2026161 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026145 ms
Oct 17, 2026142 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026149 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wallhang.com.tr (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wallhang.com.tr at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. wallhang.com.tr at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. wallhang.com.tr at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. wallhang.com.tr at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. wallhang.com.tr at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. wallhang.com.tr at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. wallhang.com.tr at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. wallhang.com.tr at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

4 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 422 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,893 HTML elements

    The page has 1,893 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 107 KiB

    About 107 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    216 KiB

    12 images could be 216 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Shopify and cloudlift.app and others), adding 244 KiB and 101 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 68 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Tap response (INP) got 54% slower for real visitors

    +54%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 67% slower for real visitors

    +67%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.138

    0.138

    The layout shifts by 0.138 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 652 ms

    652 ms

    Real visitors wait 652 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 18 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 217 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 217 requests on a phone: other files 877 KiB (115), images 618 KiB (18) and scripts 370 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    duvar_ortusu_185x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (214 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9492
  • 30 text elements with low contrast

    30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 53 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10094
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Wallhang”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 171 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 171 pages on wallhang.com.tr and 4 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “WALLHANG'in tasarımlarıyla seveceğiniz duvar örtülerini keşfedin! Odanızı duvara asmaktan hoşlanacağınız WALLHANG duvar…”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “WALLHANG | Duvar Örtüsü ile Odanıza Hayat Verin! – Wallhang”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wallhang.com.tr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wallhang.com.tr/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wallhang.com.tr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,017 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.wallhang.com.tr/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.wallhang.com.tr/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.wallhang.com.tr/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.wallhang.com.tr/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 471 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 471 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 82 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wallhang.com.tr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Upload Lift · Judge Me Reviews · Page Speed Optimizer

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on wallhang.com.tr, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25