Website review, no card needed

webedia-group.com logo

webedia-group.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202632 issues · 83 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on webedia-group.com, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.9 s2.8 sMay 2Oct 174.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.0 s
May 9, 20263.8 s
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.7 s
Jun 13, 20264.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.7 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
150 ms100 msMay 2Oct 17121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026117 ms
May 9, 2026106 ms
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026112 ms
May 30, 2026124 ms
Jun 6, 2026135 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026144 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026125 ms
Aug 1, 2026134 ms
Aug 8, 2026125 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026136 ms
Oct 3, 2026131 ms
Oct 10, 2026123 ms
Oct 17, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of webedia-group.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. webedia-group.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. webedia-group.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. webedia-group.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. webedia-group.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. webedia-group.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. webedia-group.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. webedia-group.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. webedia-group.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix57
  • Improve image delivery

    3.5 s · 1.8 MB

    12 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 204 KiB

    About 204 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 77). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 1,520 HTML elements

    The page has 1,520 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Didomi, Google Tag Manager and cloudflare.com and others), adding 387 KiB and 243 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (28 KiB).

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 149 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    37 KiB

    About 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 772 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 66 ms

    66 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 66 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    Your largest element takes 15.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “With your agreement, we and our 2 partners use cookies or s…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.3 s

    15.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 4.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Real visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 188 ms

    188 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 188 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 144 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 144 requests on a phone: images 3.6 MB (89), scripts 618 KiB (24) and HTML 349 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.34 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.34 g of CO₂e: 160.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8291
  • 77 images without alt text

    77 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7788
  • 21 links with vague text

    21 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Meta description is long (257 characters)

    Your meta description is 257 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 17 links crawlers can't follow

    17 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 85 internal links, 36 external

    The homepage links to 85 pages on webedia-group.com and 36 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Engaging audienceswith passion”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Webedia Group • Engaging Audiences with Passion”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://webedia-group.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://webedia-group.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://webedia-group.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,278 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://webedia-group.com/news/corporate/justine-planchon-joins-the-webedia-elephant-group-in-charge-of-production-and-creators, https://webedia-group.com/news/corporate, https://webedia-group.com/news/corporate/appointment-of-sylvain-andries-as-group-chief-financial-officer, https://webedia-group.com/news/corporate/the-webedia-elephant-group-now-attracts-over-380-million-unique-visitors-a-month-to-its-digital-content-according-to-comscore and https://webedia-group.com/news/corporate/francetv-publicite-expands-its-data-offerings-with-allocine have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,070 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,070 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More” and “JOIN US”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Join us” and “Contact”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Didomi) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Didomi

    A consent management tool (Didomi) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at webedia-group.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2007
Headquarters
Levallois-Perret

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on webedia-group.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25