Website review, no card needed
wevets.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202641 issues · 89 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on wevets.com.br, 14 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 391 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 391 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 380 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 379 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 376 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 376 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 381 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 381 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 389 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 393 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 399 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 408 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 418 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 427 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 438 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 442 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 443 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 449 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 454 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 464 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 903 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Main-thread work: 6.8 s
A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,662 HTML elements
The page has 3,662 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, enviou.com.br and Facebook and others), adding 1.6 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 1,010 KiB9 images could be 1,010 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 64). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
559 KiBAbout 559 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
492 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (492 KiB).
enviou.com.br adds 484 ms
484 msenviou.com.br costs a phone 484 ms of main-thread work and 58 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 329 ms
329 msFacebook costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 339 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
99 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 99 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 159 ms
159 msYour server sent the HTML in 159 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 21.2 s
21.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 348 ms
348 msReal visitors wait 348 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sYour largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WeVets: hospitais veterinários 24h com estrutura completa e…”.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 391 ms to 464 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023
0.023The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.9 MB in 162 requests
4.9 MBYour homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 162 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (35), scripts 1.8 MB (59) and fonts 150 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
CLINICA-00-768x432.png weighs 506 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images in older formats
9 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.40 g of CO₂e: 167.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
44 text elements with low contrast
44 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “WeVets: hospital veterinário 24h, plano de saúde pet e mais! - Wevets”.
Meta description is short (48 characters)
Your meta description is only 48 characters: “WeVets: plano de saúde pet, especialistas e mais”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Hospitais veterinários 24h com estrutura completa” and “WeVets: hospitais veterinários 24h com estrutura …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
180 internal links, 79 external
The homepage links to 180 pages on wevets.com.br and 79 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://wevets.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage, ImageObject, Organization, Place and VeterinaryCare.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://wevets.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://wevets.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,296 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages share a meta description
https://wevets.com.br/unidades/braz-leme, https://wevets.com.br/unidades/butanta, https://wevets.com.br/unidades/campo-belo, https://wevets.com.br/unidades/jabaquara, https://wevets.com.br/unidades/mooca and https://wevets.com.br/unidades/morumbi and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://wevets.com.br/unidades has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,056 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,056 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “FRN³ One Stop Shop”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wevets.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on wevets.com.br, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.