Website review, no card needed

whiteandwarren.com logo

whiteandwarren.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on whiteandwarren.com, 13 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.8 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms113 msMay 16Oct 31121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026121 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026122 ms
Aug 8, 2026124 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026133 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026129 ms
Sep 26, 2026127 ms
Oct 3, 2026122 ms
Oct 10, 2026120 ms
Oct 17, 2026116 ms
Oct 24, 2026120 ms
Oct 31, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of whiteandwarren.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. whiteandwarren.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. whiteandwarren.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. whiteandwarren.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. whiteandwarren.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. whiteandwarren.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. whiteandwarren.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. whiteandwarren.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  8. whiteandwarren.com at 8.4 s8.4 s

Speed

12 to fix20
  • Improve image delivery

    3.2 s · 1.1 MB

    16 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 20

    20/100

    Your mobile performance score is 20. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (pii.ai, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 783 KiB

    About 783 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 575 KiB

    58 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (575 KiB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 282 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Klaviyo adds 211 ms

    211 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 211 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,091 HTML elements

    The page has 2,091 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • JSDelivr CDN adds 110 ms

    110 ms

    JSDelivr CDN costs a phone 110 ms of main-thread work and 456 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Attentive adds 101 ms

    101 ms

    Attentive costs a phone 101 ms of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 60 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 60 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Your largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Giving Style Since 1997”.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.4 s

    26.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.612

    0.612

    The layout shifts by 0.612 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 560 ms

    560 ms

    Real visitors wait 560 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 557 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 557 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (45), scripts 2.4 MB (272) and other files 1.1 MB (171). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    56 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Screenshot_2025-04-14_at_4.57.07_PM_6b3e0ffe-8f44-49e8-9061- at 1,408 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 56 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (197 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.94 g of CO₂e: 232.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 10096
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10088
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Women's Clothing, Cashmere Travel Wraps & Knitwear | White & Warren”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 103 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 103 pages on whiteandwarren.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Shop women's cashmere sweaters, cardigans and the original Cashmere Travel Wrap. White & Warren knows cashmere and knit…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.whiteandwarren.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.whiteandwarren.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (474 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.whiteandwarren.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 308 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 308 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now.” and “Shop New Arrivals”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Shop Now.”, “Color Shop” and “The Fringe Shop”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 39 cookies set on arrival

    39

    Opening the homepage sets 39 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 68 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 68 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at whiteandwarren.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 16 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Yotpo Product Reviews · Triplewhale · Attentive · Yotpo Loyalty Rewards · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Shoppinggives · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Change Commerce · Covet Instagram Feed Reviews · rakuten.com · pii.ai · rakutenadvertising.io · amazonaws.com · retention.com · attn.tv · 9gtb.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on whiteandwarren.com, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25