Website review, no card needed

wikihow.com logo

wikihow.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202632 issues · 86 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on wikihow.com, 8 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: input buttons must have discernible text (1 element). Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.3 sApr 18Oct 31.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.4 s
Apr 25, 20261.4 s
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
219 ms186 msApr 18Oct 3192 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026203 ms
Apr 25, 2026200 ms
May 2, 2026195 ms
May 9, 2026192 ms
May 16, 2026190 ms
May 23, 2026192 ms
May 30, 2026194 ms
Jun 6, 2026195 ms
Jun 13, 2026198 ms
Jun 20, 2026201 ms
Jun 27, 2026204 ms
Jul 4, 2026208 ms
Jul 11, 2026212 ms
Jul 18, 2026214 ms
Jul 25, 2026215 ms
Aug 1, 2026213 ms
Aug 8, 2026211 ms
Aug 15, 2026208 ms
Aug 22, 2026204 ms
Aug 29, 2026201 ms
Sep 5, 2026198 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026195 ms
Sep 26, 2026194 ms
Oct 3, 2026192 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wikihow.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wikihow.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wikihow.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wikihow.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. wikihow.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. wikihow.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. wikihow.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. wikihow.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. wikihow.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix99
  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 1.3 MB

    31 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,517 HTML elements

    The page has 1,517 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    154 KiB

    About 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 191 KiB and 94 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    16 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 99

    99/100

    Your mobile performance score is 99 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 402 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 203 ms to 192 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Real visitors wait 124 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 751 ms

    751 ms

    Real visitors wait 751 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.6 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Welcome to wikiHow, the most trusted how-to site on the int…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 38 ms

    38 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 38 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 88 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (70), scripts 411 KiB (8) and HTML 79 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (504 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    297 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shawn_achor_logo.png at 524 px wide, shown at 121 px. Resized copies would save about 297 KiB.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (504 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7485
  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 90 text elements with low contrast

    90 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 19 tap targets too small

    19 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 151 images without alt text

    151 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7788
  • Meta description is long (164 characters)

    Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 245 internal links, 24 external

    The homepage links to 245 pages on wikihow.com and 24 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcome to wikiHow, the most trusted how-to site on the internet.”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “wikiHow: How-to instructions you can trust.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wikihow.com/Main-Page.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wikihow.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 5 AI answer engine crawlers

    5 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wikihow.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,851 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix70
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.wikihow.com/Special:RequestTopic and https://www.wikihow.com/Special:CommunityDashboard are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro all use the title “Client Challenge”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.wikihow.com/Pro, https://www.wikihow.com/Guides, https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro, https://www.wikihow.com/wikiHow:Videos-wikiHowPro, https://www.wikihow.com/Special:RequestTopic and https://www.wikihow.com/Special:CommunityDashboard have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.wikihow.com/Special:Randomizer, whose canonical is https://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Landscape-Quilt. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 173 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    30 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,597 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,597 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Request a New Article”, “Log in / Sign up” and “Join Discussion”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 5 customer or partner logos.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wikihow.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
MediaWiki 1.33.0-alpha

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on wikihow.com, including 4 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25