Website review, no card needed
wikihow.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202632 issues · 86 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on wikihow.com, 8 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: input buttons must have discernible text (1 element). Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
93AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 195 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 190 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 192 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
350 ms · 1.3 MB31 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.
1,517 HTML elements
The page has 1,517 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 191 KiB and 94 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
52 KiBAbout 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 99
99/100Your mobile performance score is 99 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 1.1 s
A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 402 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 19 ms
19 msYour server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 11.7 s
11.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 203 ms to 192 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 124 ms
124 msReal visitors wait 124 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 751 ms
751 msReal visitors wait 751 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 2.5 s
2.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.5 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.6 s
1.6 sYour largest element renders in 1.6 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Welcome to wikiHow, the most trusted how-to site on the int…”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 38 ms
38 msScripts block the page for only 38 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 88 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (70), scripts 411 KiB (8) and HTML 79 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (504 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images far larger than shown
297 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shawn_achor_logo.png at 524 px wide, shown at 121 px. Resized copies would save about 297 KiB.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (504 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)
Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
90 text elements with low contrast
90 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
19 tap targets too small
19 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Positive tabindex
1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
151 images without alt text
151 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (164 characters)
Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
245 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 245 pages on wikihow.com and 24 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Welcome to wikiHow, the most trusted how-to site on the internet.”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “wikiHow: How-to instructions you can trust.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.wikihow.com/Main-Page.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wikihow.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 5 AI answer engine crawlers
5 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.wikihow.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,851 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.wikihow.com/Special:RequestTopic and https://www.wikihow.com/Special:CommunityDashboard are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro all use the title “Client Challenge”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://www.wikihow.com/Pro, https://www.wikihow.com/Guides, https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro, https://www.wikihow.com/wikiHow:Videos-wikiHowPro, https://www.wikihow.com/Special:RequestTopic and https://www.wikihow.com/Special:CommunityDashboard have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.wikihow.com/Special:Randomizer, whose canonical is https://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Landscape-Quilt. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.wikihow.com/Pro and https://www.wikihow.com/Tech-Help-Pro have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 173 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
30 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,597 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,597 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Request a New Article”, “Log in / Sign up” and “Join Discussion”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks and 5 customer or partner logos.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wikihow.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- MediaWiki 1.33.0-alpha
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on wikihow.com, including 4 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.