Website review, no card needed
willowbythesea.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202643 issues · 88 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on willowbythesea.com, 16 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: avoid multiple page redirects. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #69,662 of 105,458 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #43,946 of 59,269 online storesbeats 22%
- #41,527 of 54,010 Shopify storesbeats 19%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 121 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 102 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.2 s
4.3 s
5.4 s
6.5 s
7.6 s
8.6 s
Speed
Avoid multiple page redirects
32.7 sThe page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 32.7 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Reduce unused JavaScript
12.6 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.0 s · 974 KiB19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (974 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.8 s · 636 KiB22 images could be 636 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.6 s · 120 KiBAbout 120 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 11.2 s
A phone's processor spends 11.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, gotolstoy.com and Yotpo and others), adding 3.7 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
750 ms · 31 KiB31 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
gotolstoy.com adds 439 ms
439 msgotolstoy.com costs a phone 439 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 448 ms
448 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 448 ms of main-thread work and 164 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
450 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 450 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
rebuyengine.com adds 342 ms
342 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 342 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Yotpo adds 376 ms
376 msYotpo costs a phone 376 ms of main-thread work and 546 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
PayPal adds 306 ms
306 msPayPal costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 392 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,149 HTML elements
The page has 2,149 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 54.7 s
54.7 sYour largest element takes 54.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 17.0 s
17.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 55.4 s
55.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 55.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 104 ms
104 msReal visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 102 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 25.9 MB in 543 requests
25.9 MBYour homepage downloads 25.9 MB in 543 requests on a phone: media 14.5 MB (3), images 5.1 MB (89) and scripts 3.9 MB (204). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 7.3 g of CO₂ per visit
7.34 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.34 g of CO₂e: 880.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
22 text elements with low contrast
22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (16 elements).
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “Willow By The Sea”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
84 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 84 pages on willowbythesea.com and 7 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 130 characters
Your meta description is 130 characters: “Pure Organics For Brand New Skin. 100% organic skin care products for pregnancy, baby and postpartum. Cruelty free and …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “30% OFF EVERYTHING. BLACK FRIDAY SALE”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://willowbythesea.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://willowbythesea.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (511 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://willowbythesea.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://willowbythesea.com/contact, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a meta description
https://willowbythesea.com/blogs/stories has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://willowbythesea.com/pages/choose-your-ritual, https://willowbythesea.com/pages/our-story, https://willowbythesea.com/blogs/stories and https://willowbythesea.com/collections have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 336 words of copy
The homepage carries about 336 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All Products” and “Shop Expand menu”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks and 16 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at willowbythesea.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Rebuy Personalization Engine · Tolstoy · Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Yotpo Loyalty Rewards · Giftnote App
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on willowbythesea.com, including 28 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.