Website review, no card needed

worthpoint.com logo

worthpoint.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on worthpoint.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.6 sApr 18Oct 31.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.7 s
Apr 25, 20261.7 s
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
187 ms112 msApr 18Oct 3131 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026173 ms
Apr 25, 2026174 ms
May 2, 2026177 ms
May 9, 2026177 ms
May 16, 2026178 ms
May 23, 2026178 ms
May 30, 2026165 ms
Jun 6, 2026150 ms
Jun 13, 2026135 ms
Jun 20, 2026123 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026124 ms
Jul 25, 2026125 ms
Aug 1, 2026126 ms
Aug 8, 2026127 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026130 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026131 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of worthpoint.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. worthpoint.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. worthpoint.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. worthpoint.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. worthpoint.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. worthpoint.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. worthpoint.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. worthpoint.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. worthpoint.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix62
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 738 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (738 KiB).

  • crcldu.com adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    crcldu.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 218 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (crcldu.com, px-cloud.net and px-client.net and others), adding 595 KiB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 64). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • px-cloud.net adds 814 ms

    814 ms

    px-cloud.net costs a phone 814 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 699 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 73 KiB

    About 73 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Document request latency

    3 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 207 ms

    207 ms

    Real visitors wait 207 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Your largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Press & Hold to confirm you are a human (and not a bot).”.

  • Speed Index: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 482 ms

    482 ms

    Real visitors wait 482 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.24 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.24 g of CO₂e: 29.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 876 KiB in 20 requests

    876 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 876 KiB in 20 requests on a phone: scripts 775 KiB (5), fonts 75 KiB (2) and other files 12 KiB (8). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8595
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 25 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9168
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Error status code

    The page answers with an error status, so search engines may drop it.

  • Meta description is long (209 characters)

    Your meta description is 209 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.worthpoint.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 114 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 114 pages on worthpoint.com and 17 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Antiques, Art, and Collectibles - What's it Worth? | WorthPoint”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.worthpoint.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 1 AI crawler

    Your robots.txt lets Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.worthpoint.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,445 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.worthpoint.com/articles/searchResults is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages share a title

    https://www.worthpoint.com/dictionary, https://www.worthpoint.com/live-auctions/events, https://www.worthpoint.com/live-auctions/items and https://www.worthpoint.com/data-partners all use the title “WorthPoint”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia, https://www.worthpoint.com/marks, https://www.worthpoint.com/library, https://www.worthpoint.com/dictionary, https://www.worthpoint.com/live-auctions/events and https://www.worthpoint.com/live-auctions/items and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.worthpoint.com/articles/searchResults and https://www.worthpoint.com/page/newsletter-landing-page use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia, https://www.worthpoint.com/marks, https://www.worthpoint.com/library, https://www.worthpoint.com/dictionary, https://www.worthpoint.com/data-partners and https://www.worthpoint.com/articles/searchResults have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a title

    All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,841 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,841 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Newsletter Signup”, “Try for free” and “Start to explore”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at worthpoint.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on worthpoint.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25