Website review, no card needed
yankovsky.info website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202639 issues · 69 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on yankovsky.info, 16 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
12.2 s · 2.6 MB5 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.3 s · 1.1 MB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 s · 279 KiBAbout 279 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.3 s · 214 KiBAbout 214 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google Fonts and others), adding 3.5 MB and 209 ms of main-thread time.
googleusercontent.com adds 0 ms
0 msgoogleusercontent.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 174 ms
174 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 174 ms of main-thread work and 633 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 75 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 230 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.5 s
19.5 sYour largest element takes 19.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 19.5 s
19.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sThe first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.395
0.395The layout shifts by 0.395 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 25 ms
25 msScripts block the page for only 25 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
APXyLQfJI6rbXgtAaZ_sJFqtfzZS2fdJDav1FPiLBKVlCBTta21zNm41FnSW weighs 2.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example APXyLQfJI6rbXgtAaZ_sJFqtfzZS2fdJDav1FPiLBKVlCBTta21zNm41FnSW at 1,280 px wide, shown at 352 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 32 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 32 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (8), scripts 529 KiB (10) and stylesheets 223 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images in older formats
4 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (415 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.00 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 120.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (78 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 78 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Nick Yankovsky”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Summary”, “Experience” and “Recommendations”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.yankovsky.info/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at yankovsky.info/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
9 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 9 pages on yankovsky.info and 18 external pages.
1 checks passed
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.yankovsky.info/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,079 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.yankovsky.info/home all use the title “Nick Yankovsky”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.yankovsky.info/home and https://www.yankovsky.info/me have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.yankovsky.info/me has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 internal pages checked
We fetched 2 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 2 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to fetch at 'https://play.google.com/log?format=json&hasfast=true&authuser=0' from origin 'https://www.yankovsky…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 414 words of copy
The homepage carries about 414 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Download CV” and “Book a meeting”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges and “100M+ customers”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yankovsky.info, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on yankovsky.info, including 15 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.