Website review, no card needed
yosushi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202632 issues · 83 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on yosushi.com, 10 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 879 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 869 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 847 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 845 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 844 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 836 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 859 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 862 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 861 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 878 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 868 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 867 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 856 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 848 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 842 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 831 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 843 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 851 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 895 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 811 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 800 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 787 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 756 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 798 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 800 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 519 KiBAbout 519 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.0 s · 331 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (331 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, TikTok and Facebook and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 549 ms
549 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 549 ms of main-thread work and 346 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
411 KiB6 images could be 411 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 355 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
TikTok adds 302 ms
302 msTikTok costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 157 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 290 ms
290 msFacebook costs a phone 290 ms of main-thread work and 224 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.2 s
11.2 sYour largest element takes 11.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “new menu”.
Time to Interactive: 11.3 s
11.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 874 ms
874 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 874 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s
1.9 sThe first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 195 ms
195 msReal visitors wait 195 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 545 ms
545 msReal visitors wait 545 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.3 MB in 64 requests
2.3 MBYour homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 64 requests on a phone: images 1.1 MB (10), scripts 1.0 MB (24) and fonts 103 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (65 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit
0.66 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.66 g of CO₂e: 79.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
27 text elements with low contrast
27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
44 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 44 pages on yosushi.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 115 characters
Your meta description is 115 characters: “Explore our menu for dishes made from the freshest ingredients, sustainably-sourced seafood and authentic products.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “all about beef”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “YO! Sushi menu - explore delicious Japanese inspired dishes”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://yosushi.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://yosushi.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://yosushi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (308 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
10 pages without a meta description
https://yosushi.com/loyalty, https://yosushi.com/loveclub, https://yosushi.com/content/beef-menu, https://yosushi.com/your-bento-your-way, https://yosushi.com/menu/beef-katsu-sando and https://yosushi.com/menu/beef-tataki and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages with very little text
https://yosushi.com/restaurants and https://yosushi.com/menu/seared-beef-nigiri have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 279 words of copy
The homepage carries about 279 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “book a table”, “order now” and “get a free plate”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yosushi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Soho
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on yosushi.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.