Website review, no card needed

yunsa.com logo

yunsa.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202649 issues · 93 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on yunsa.com, 21 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.6 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
102 ms89 msMay 9Oct 2495 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202692 ms
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 202690 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202691 ms
Jun 20, 202692 ms
Jun 27, 202693 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 202697 ms
Jul 25, 2026100 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202693 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 202697 ms
Aug 29, 202698 ms
Sep 5, 202699 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202690 ms
Oct 3, 202690 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202697 ms
Oct 24, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of yunsa.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. yunsa.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. yunsa.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. yunsa.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. yunsa.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. yunsa.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. yunsa.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. yunsa.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. yunsa.com at 5.2 s5.2 s

Speed

11 to fix49
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.0 s · 1.3 MB

    56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 644 KiB

    10 images could be 644 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 295 KiB

    About 295 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 85). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Google Fonts and others), adding 676 KiB and 520 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 345 ms

    345 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 69 KiB

    69 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 50 KiB

    About 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 234 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 49. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.9 s

    10.9 s

    Your largest element takes 10.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Bu internet sitesinde sizlere daha iyi hizmet sunulabilmesi…”.

  • Speed Index: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 419 ms

    419 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 419 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 742 ms

    742 ms

    Real visitors wait 742 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 75 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 75 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (26), scripts 853 KiB (27) and stylesheets 90 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (460 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (255 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.69 g of CO₂e: 83.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 6382
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 15 images without alt text

    15 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9272
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Yünsa - Creation of Fabrics”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 7 H1 headlines

    There are 7 <h1> headlines (“YATIRIMCI TAZMİN MERKEZİNE BAŞVURU SÜRESİ HAKKIND…”, “Hakkımızda” and “KİLOMETRE TAŞLARI”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (183 characters)

    Your meta description is 183 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.yunsa.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 86 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on yunsa.com and 11 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.yunsa.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (749 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.yunsa.com/hakkimizda, https://www.yunsa.com/misyon-vizyon-degerler, https://www.yunsa.com/politikalarimiz, https://www.yunsa.com/kurumsal-uyeliklerimiz, https://www.yunsa.com/kilometre-taslari and https://www.yunsa.com/urunlerimiz and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.yunsa.com/hakkimizda, https://www.yunsa.com/misyon-vizyon-degerler, https://www.yunsa.com/politikalarimiz, https://www.yunsa.com/kurumsal-uyeliklerimiz, https://www.yunsa.com/kilometre-taslari and https://www.yunsa.com/urunlerimiz and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.yunsa.com/politikalarimiz took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.yunsa.com/#.

  • 60 small tap targets

    60 of 85 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix36
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 529 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 529 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at yunsa.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2018.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on yunsa.com, including 19 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25