Website review, no card needed

zenika.com logo

zenika.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202620 issues · 66 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on zenika.com, 4 of them high impact, across 66 checks. The most urgent: 3 buttons without a name. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.1 sAug 22Sep 122.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zenika.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zenika.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. zenika.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. zenika.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  4. zenika.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  5. zenika.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  6. zenika.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  7. zenika.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. zenika.com at 6.5 s6.5 s

Speed

92
  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (prismic.io and Google Fonts), adding 325 KiB and 7 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 92

    92/100

    Your mobile performance score is 92. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 852 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 105 ms

    105 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 105 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix97
  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “The link between the organic and the digital worlds”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.23 g of CO₂e: 27.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 838 KiB in 89 requests

    838 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 838 KiB in 89 requests on a phone: scripts 399 KiB (19), images 305 KiB (47) and fonts 53 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 10069
  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “Zenika”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (185 characters)

    Your meta description is 185 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://zenika.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at zenika.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 26 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 26 pages on zenika.com and 13 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The link between the organic and the digital worlds”.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    24%

    A phone browser shows 538 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 131. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://zenika.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://zenika.com/en-CA and https://zenika.com/en-CA/contact all use the title “Zenika”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/values, https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/career, https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/offers, https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/agile and https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/green-it have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 pages with very little text

    https://zenika.com/en-CA/pages/career, https://zenika.com/en-CA/contact, https://zenika.com/en-US/agency/brest, https://zenika.com/en-US/agency/bordeaux, https://zenika.com/en-US/agency/casablanca and https://zenika.com/en-US/agency/clermont-ferrand and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 538 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 538 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Contact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zenika.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2024.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Clever Cloud SAS

Hiring

Hiring
5 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Headquarters
Paris

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on zenika.com, including 3 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25