Website review, no card needed
zigzag.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202641 issues · 88 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on zigzag.com, 9 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #41,729 of 92,604 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #26,012 of 49,244 online storesbeats 41%
- #24,815 of 44,419 Shopify storesbeats 38%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 142 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 183 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.0 s · 1.5 MB11 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 6.0 s
A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,583 HTML elements
The page has 3,583 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (rebuyengine.com, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 777 KiBAbout 777 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 397 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (397 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
500 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
rebuyengine.com adds 251 ms
251 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 251 ms of main-thread work and 656 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 247 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 80 KiBAbout 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
98 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 98 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 18 ms
18 msYour server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.8 s
10.8 sYour largest element takes 10.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.8 s
8.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 247 ms
247 msReal visitors wait 247 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 142 ms to 183 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 505 ms
505 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 505 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 526 ms
526 msReal visitors wait 526 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.016
0.016The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.016, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 316 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 316 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (51), scripts 1.7 MB (108) and other files 876 KiB (124). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
18 images in older formats
18 images (3.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
15 images below the first screen load straight away
15 images further down the page (1.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
hemp_cones_3.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image far larger than shown
111 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 3980425205515991035.jpg at 1,080 px wide, shown at 164 px. Resized copies would save about 111 KiB.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
20 links without text
20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 132 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at zigzag.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
128 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 128 pages on zigzag.com and 21 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 139 characters
Your meta description is 139 characters: “Enhance your roll with iconic rolling papers made from premium ingredients. Discover high-quality smoking accessories f…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Zig-Zag”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Rolling Papers by Zig-Zag | Smoking Accessories”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://zigzag.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://zigzag.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,428 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://zigzag.com/collections/all-papers, https://zigzag.com/collections/bundle-save, https://zigzag.com/collections/cool-sh, https://zigzag.com/pages/the-cousin-walk and https://zigzag.com/pages/hemp-cones have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://zigzag.com/products/organic-hemp-pre-rolled-cones-1-1-4-24-pack and https://zigzag.com/products/organic-hemp-pre-rolled-cones-1-1-4-70mm use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
https://zigzag.com/pages/vintage-collection and https://zigzag.com/pages/hemp-cones have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://zigzag.com/collections/all-papers took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 62 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
63 of 66 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 555 words of copy
The homepage carries about 555 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP NOW” and “Zig-Zag Stash Book Volume 2”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “SHOP NOW”, “Shop Papers” and “Shop NOW”.
53 short forms
53 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
57 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 57 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zigzag.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 15 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Triplewhale · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Instafeed · Rebuy Personalization Engine · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Hulk Form Builder · Yotpo Product Reviews · Instagram Story App · Gift Box Builder · Twitter Multi Pixels · elfsight.com · luckyorange.com · rechargecdn.com · useifsapp.com · blocky-app.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Louisville
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on zigzag.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.