Website review, no card needed

zocalo.com.mx logo

zocalo.com.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202645 issues · 88 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on zocalo.com.mx, 19 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
119 ms112 msMay 2Oct 17113 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026116 ms
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026116 ms
Jun 20, 2026115 ms
Jun 27, 2026117 ms
Jul 4, 2026118 ms
Jul 11, 2026115 ms
Jul 18, 2026115 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026113 ms
Aug 15, 2026113 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026116 ms
Sep 19, 2026117 ms
Sep 26, 2026116 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zocalo.com.mx (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zocalo.com.mx at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. zocalo.com.mx at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. zocalo.com.mx at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. zocalo.com.mx at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. zocalo.com.mx at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. zocalo.com.mx at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. zocalo.com.mx at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. zocalo.com.mx at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

6 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 3.5 MB

    64 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.5 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 327 KiB

    About 327 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.8 MB

    6 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 1,788 HTML elements

    The page has 1,788 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google/Doubleclick Ads, cloudfront.net and consentframework.com and others), adding 563 KiB and 397 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 108 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 85 but mobile only 55. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 569 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Your largest element takes 8.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.131

    0.131

    The layout shifts by 0.131 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 477 ms

    477 ms

    Real visitors wait 477 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 73 ms

    73 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 73 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 4.6 MB in 84 requests

    4.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (30), scripts 650 KiB (26) and fonts 188 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Ruba_5.gif weighs 2.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (3.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    255 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example f1-5.jpg at 650 px wide, shown at 105 px. Resized copies would save about 255 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (46 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.31 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.31 g of CO₂e: 157.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7786
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 107 text elements with low contrast

    107 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 20 tap targets too small

    20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (196 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 196 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 40 links without text

    40 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Hidden but focusable

    2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 145 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8362
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (81 characters)

    Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Periódico Zócalo | Noticias de Saltillo, Torreón, Piedras Negras, Monclova, Acuña”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Mató a su esposa y luego se quitó la vida en Monc…”, “Tocará U2 en medio tiempo de NFL; amenizará parti…” and “Declara hijo de Halle Berry por disputa de custod…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.zocalo.com.mx/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 8 links crawlers can't follow

    8 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 211 internal links, 38 external

    The homepage links to 211 pages on zocalo.com.mx and 38 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.zocalo.com.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,759 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/video, https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/nacional, https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/internacional, https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/seguridad, https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/dinero and https://www.zocalo.com.mx/category/deportes and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.zocalo.com.mx/opinion and https://www.zocalo.com.mx/edicion-impresa have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 106 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 32 small tap targets

    32 of 91 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “googletag is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,847 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,847 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zocalo.com.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on zocalo.com.mx, including 13 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25