Website review, no card needed
zoom.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202624 issues · 68 checks
This review found 24 issues worth fixing on zoom.com, 10 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 298 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 279 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 268 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 268 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 300 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Not measured in this review.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 299 ms
299 msReal visitors wait 299 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 313 ms to 300 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB on a phone, 1.0 MB of it images (28%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.06 g of CO₂e: 126.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 10 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Corporation, WebPage and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
249 internal links, 110 external
The homepage links to 249 pages on zoom.com and 110 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Modernize workflows with Zoom's trusted collaboration tools: including video meetings, Zoom Chat, VoIP phone, webinars,…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Find out what's possible when work connects”.
Title: 30 characters
Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “One platform to connect | Zoom”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.zoom.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zoom.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,730 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages point its canonical at the homepage
/de, /es, /fr, /id, /it and /ja and 7 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
14 pages share a title
/, /de, /es, /fr, /id and /it and 8 others all use the title “One platform to connect | Zoom”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
13 pages share a meta description
/de, /es, /fr, /id, /it and /ja and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page slow to respond
/en/products/whats-new took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 104 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://px.adentifi.com/Pixels?a_id=27236;p_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zoom.com%2F;uq=4845099287773.947.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
28 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 502 words of copy
The homepage carries about 502 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Center”.
44 calls to action
The homepage has 44 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Contact Sales” and “Sign Up Free”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 5 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 3 trust badges and “7.9k+ reviews”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 6 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
41 cookies set on arrival
41Opening the homepage sets 41 cookies, 6 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
65 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 65 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zoom.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Employees
- 2,000
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- San Jose
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 24 issues on zoom.com, including 6 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.