The headline row of Aspect's Frame.io comparison says Frame.io is "a review destination you upload videos to rather than a mounted drive you edit from", and the FAQ lists mounting as something Aspect does "that Frame.io does not". Frame.io's own help center now says "Mounting makes a Frame.io project appear as a local drive on your desktop" and streams only the files you open into Premiere Pro, After Effects and Resolve. Frame.io users are the buyers most likely to know about Frame.io Drive, and one row they know is wrong makes them doubt every other row, on the page meant to win them over.
First action
Edit the "Stream and mount projects into your NLE" row and the matching FAQ answer today.
How to measure it
Frame.io page conversions
- Now
- –
- Target
- +30%
- By
- 60 days
Steps
Correct the row
Change the mount row and FAQ to say Frame.io Drive mounts projects, and say how Aspect differs.
CEO 1 hour
Confirm the quota facts
Check exactly how much of a Pro seat's 500 GB can be mounted and how offline pinning behaves, so the page claims nothing product can't back.
Co-founder, desktop and web clients 1 day
Rewrite the TL;DR
Lead with mounted quota, offline pinning, the on-site cache, folder-preserving downloads and AI search.
CEO 1 day
Date and source it
Add "Last checked" and a link to Frame.io's pricing or help page next to each claim about Frame.io.
Founding Designer 2 hours
Add a switching block
The free migration of projects, versions and history, plus one quote from a team that moved from Frame.io (see idea 2).
CEO 1 week
Audit the other 17
Check every "No" against the rival's current pricing or help pages, LucidLink and Suite Studios first.
CEO 2 weeks
Re-check every quarter
And after each NAB or IBC, when rivals ship new features.
CEO quarterly
Why it works
Rewrite the mount row and the FAQ to acknowledge Frame.io Drive, then compete on differences that are still true and checkable in Frame.io's own documents: Frame.io's Mounted Storage is a separate quota (250 GB on Pro, 500 GB on Team) on top of standard storage, while Aspect Pro gives 500 GB per seat in the filespace it mounts (confirm the wording with product); Frame.io mounting needs an active connection, while Aspect lets editors pin files before going offline; Aspect has an on-site cache node for facilities, folder-preserving downloads, AI beyond transcription, and storage, review and delivery on one bill. Add a "Last checked" date and a source link next to every claim about the rival. Then check the other 17 comparison pages the same way, starting with LucidLink and Suite Studios, which also sell mounted streaming.
Comparison pages are read at the moment of decision by buyers who know the rival well. An honest concession makes the remaining claims believable, and a dated, sourced page is harder for a rival's sales team to dismiss and safer when search engines and AI assistants summarise it.
Ready to use
ChecklistComparison page accuracy check
[ ] Every "No" for the rival checked against its current pricing or help page [ ] Source link next to each rival claim [ ] "Last checked" date at the top [ ] Aspect's own claims confirmed by product (quota, offline, cache) [ ] Free migration offer and one switcher quote [ ] Prices for both sides, or a link to both pricing pages [ ] Re-check booked for next quarter
Risks and how to handle them
Admitting Frame.io mounts weakens the pitch
Lead with the quota, offline and cache differences, which Frame.io's own documents confirm.
Rivals change again and the page drifts
Show the check date and re-check every quarter.
Evidence
- Your websiteAspect vs. Frame.io page (checked November 10, 2026): the row "Stream and mount projects into your NLE" says "No, Frame.io is a review destination you upload videos to rather than a mounted drive you edit from." and the FAQ lists mounting as something Aspect does "that Frame.io does not". The page never mentions Frame.io Drive or Mounted Storage, has no date and names no customers.Source
- Competitor researchFrame.io help center, Frame.io Drive: "Mounting makes a Frame.io project appear as a local drive on your desktop"; "Only files you actually open are streamed; nothing downloads in the background"; mounted projects open in Premiere Pro, After Effects and DaVinci Resolve without plugins; an active internet connection is required; up to 10 projects mounted at once.Source
- Competitor researchFrame.io pricing: Free $0 (2 members, 2 GB); Pro $15 per member a month (up to 5, 2 TB plus 2 TB per added member, 250 GB Mounted Storage); Team $25 per member a month (up to 15, 3 TB plus 2 TB per added member, 500 GB Mounted Storage); Mounted Storage is "a separate allocation" from standard storage; annual plans save 13%.Source
- Your websitePost-production page: "Edit 100GB files without the download" in Premiere Pro, Resolve or Avid; pin files before going offline; an on-site cache node so one workstation pulls from the cloud and other bays read over the LAN; "No bandwidth upgrades"; no named customers or benchmarks.Source
- Your websiteComparisons hub: "How Aspect compares" with 18 rival pages in five groups (Streaming: LucidLink, Suite Studios, Resilio; Storage: Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint; DAM: Iconik, Bynder, Air, Playbook; Review: Frame.io, MediaSilo, Wipster, Ziflow, Vimeo Review; Transfer: MASV, WeTransfer). No dates and no customer proof; the LucidLink page promises "Switching takes one afternoon" without a single named switcher.Source