The new Senior PMM is hired to keep "a unified narrative in the market", and the site's promise is "Trust at scale. Undeniably proven." Yet the proof points disagree across pages: the homepage says Benevity validates "2.5 million organizations" while its own comparison table says "312K+"; it says money moves to "200+ countries" while pricing says "150+ countries"; culture is 75% on the homepage and 77% on the Bonterra page; total impact is $16.6B donated plus $20.1B in grants on one page and "$34.5 billion" on another; the demo page says clients are "1,000 or more employees" and "thousands of employees". A CFO or procurement lead comparing pages sees a vendor that cannot keep its own numbers straight.
First action
List every number on the homepage, pricing, demo and comparison pages in one sheet.
How to measure it
Pages aligned to the proof sheet
- Now
- –
- Target
- All top 30 pages
- By
- 30 days
Steps
Collect the numbers
Every stat on the top 30 pages, with page and wording.
Product Marketing Manager 1 day
Define each one
What it counts, which year, which source (Annual Impact Report, client survey).
Senior Manager, Product Marketing 2 days
Split look-alikes
"Validated" vs "funded" nonprofits; disbursement countries vs validation countries.
Senior Manager, Product Marketing 1 day
Fix the site
Homepage table, pricing, demo FAQ, comparison pages, footer year.
Web team 3 days
Fix the decks
Sales deck, one-pagers and competitor comparisons.
Product Marketing Manager 1 week
Brief partners
PR agency and paid media get the sheet.
External Communications Manager 1 day
Set an owner
One person updates the sheet when the Annual Impact Report changes.
Senior Manager, Product Marketing yearly
Why it works
Write one source-of-truth proof sheet (each number, its definition, its source and its date), then fix every page to match it: say "312K nonprofits funded in 2025" and "2.5M nonprofits validated" as two different numbers, pick one country figure with a footnote, align the survey percentages and the client-size line, and update the "© 2025" footer. Give the sheet to sales, demand gen and the PR agency so decks, ads and press use the same figures.
Enterprise buyers check claims before they bring a vendor to finance and legal. Consistent, defined numbers are the cheapest credibility gain available, and they also stop AI assistants from quoting the wrong figure.
Ready to use
ChecklistProof sheet columns
[ ] Claim as written on the site [ ] Definition (what is counted) [ ] Period (year or to date) [ ] Source (Annual Impact Report, client survey, platform data) [ ] Pages where it appears [ ] Approved wording [ ] Owner and next review date
Risks and how to handle them
Some figures have no clean source
Remove them rather than round them up.
Pages drift again
Store the numbers once in the CMS and reuse them as components.
Evidence
- HiringSenior Manager, Product Marketing (two posts, Calgary, September 21 and 25, 2026): owns "the end-to-end messaging and GTM strategy for the Benevity Enterprise Impact Platform", aligns output "ensuring a unified narrative in the market", standardizes "messaging frameworks, and competitive intelligence", and must "Ensure product messages proliferate throughout the buyer and client journey by collaborating with website, content, and demand generation teams."Source
- Your websiteHomepage: "Trust at scale. Undeniably proven."; "$16.6B Total donated", "122.9M Total volunteer hours", "$20.1B Total grants managed" (2025 Annual Impact Report); "99% payment success. 200+ countries."; "Continuous nonprofit validation across 2.5 million organizations", while the "Benevity vs. Point Solutions" table on the same page says "Continuous nonprofit validation, 312K+"; "75% say Benevity helps them build a stronger, more connected culture"; an AI block lists Match Assurance, AI Grant Summaries and "Total Governance" ("the ability to opt out of any usage in the platform"); "Trusted by nearly 1,000 of the world's most admired companies"; the footer reads "© 2025".Source
- Your websitePricing page: no list prices; modules plus a platform fee "scoped to your company's size and complexity"; disbursement to "2.5M+ validated nonprofits across 150+ countries and 100+ currencies"; "98% of clients renew year over year, with an average client tenure of 5.8 years"; an honest fit section ("You may be better served by another solution if you... Run a single-country program with a small employee population"); "Estimate my ROI" links to a two-minute Business Impact Calculator; "Impact Labs benchmarks your program against 1,000+ corporate peers"; it cites Impact Labs: "55% of companies report increased scrutiny of their purpose programs, and two-thirds of large corporate firms name legal and compliance as the primary source of that scrutiny."Source
- Your websiteDemo page: "In 2025, clients donated $2.7B, logged 23.7M volunteer hours, and supported 312K nonprofits"; Benevity "continuously validates nonprofits across 200+ countries and territories"; clients are "typically companies with 1,000 or more employees", while the same page's FAQ says "typically companies with thousands of employees".Source
- Your websiteComparison pages exist for YourCause, Bonterra CyberGrants, Deed and Submittable. The Bonterra page says clients "have collectively disbursed over $34.5 billion in total donations and grants" and "logged over 100 million volunteer hours", cites "77%" for a stronger culture, quotes G2 scores (support 9.3 vs 8.8, ease of use 9.0 vs 8.2) and is "current as of September 15, 2026"; it notes Bonterra acquired Deed in March 2026.Source