Gitcoin growth playbook

Publish a GG25 page today with what is known (domains under consideration, yield-powered matching, how to apply or co-fund) and a "notify me" form that tags donors, builders and funders separately in HubSpot. Feature it first on the homepage and campaigns page. Then run a simple pre-round sequence: why GG24 worked, the domains, the builders to watch, and an "opens this week" reminder, with each GG24 domain partner sharing it to their audience.

Rounds succeed on donors who show up in the first days, and those donors are easiest to win back when they hear early and specifically. A page and list built now turn GG25 into a launch, not an announcement, and give partners something to link to.

[ ] GG25 page: domains, matching, how to donate, apply and co-fund
[ ] Notify form with donor / builder / funder tags
[ ] Homepage and campaigns page feature GG25 first
[ ] Opted-in GG23 and GG24 contacts imported
[ ] Four-email pre-round sequence
[ ] Partner share kit (copy, image, link)
[ ] Weekly social posts
[ ] Sign-up and donation tracking by source

• Details not final

  Mark the page "draft" and update it as governance decides.

• Consent for past donors

  Email only contacts who opted in; invite others via social.

• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source
• Your websiteGet Updates page: a single line, "We'll share key updates and announcements with you", and an email field; no sample issue, frequency or topic choice. The site runs HubSpot.Source
• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source

Pull live counts from the content folders at build time and show them on the cards, with a "last updated" date. Use honest growth targets in internal docs instead.

Accurate numbers are the cheapest credibility fix for a reference site, and researchers notice.

• Small numbers look weak

  Show the total (240+ entries) as the headline.

• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source
• Your websiteSitemap (244 URLs): newest lastmod May 7, 2026 (the Gitcoin x Octant yield-matching case study); mechanisms last updated March 5 and research March 6, 2026. /about, /partner and /updates are not in the sitemap. The footer YouTube link (youtube.com/gitcoin) returns 404.Source

Name the newsletter, show the last three issues, offer topic choices (rounds and deadlines, research, funding opportunities for builders), and say how often it comes. Add the signup at the end of every research and case study page.

Readers subscribe when they can see the value, and topic choice keeps donors, builders and funders from unsubscribing.

• Irregular sending

  Keep a fixed monthly date.

• Your websiteGet Updates page: a single line, "We'll share key updates and announcements with you", and an email field; no sample issue, frequency or topic choice. The site runs HubSpot.Source
• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websiteSitemap (244 URLs): newest lastmod May 7, 2026 (the Gitcoin x Octant yield-matching case study); mechanisms last updated March 5 and research March 6, 2026. /about, /partner and /updates are not in the sitemap. The footer YouTube link (youtube.com/gitcoin) returns 404.Source

Point the footer at the live channel (or remove it), add /about, /partner and /updates to the sitemap, and add a link check to the build.

Small fixes keep a reference site trustworthy and help search engines find the pages that bring partners.

• None

  Low-risk change.

• Your websiteSitemap (244 URLs): newest lastmod May 7, 2026 (the Gitcoin x Octant yield-matching case study); mechanisms last updated March 5 and research March 6, 2026. /about, /partner and /updates are not in the sitemap. The footer YouTube link (youtube.com/gitcoin) returns 404.Source
• Your websitePartner page: "Run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, or co-fund public goods with Gitcoin", a three-field contact form (name, email, anything else) and a "Trusted by leading protocols" section; no examples of partner results, costs or timelines on the page.Source

Add three partner paths (run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, yield-powered matching) each with an example, the result, the time it takes and who to talk to, plus a short partner FAQ.

Funders decide faster when they can see the path and the outcome, and it qualifies the form leads.

• Partners want privacy

  Use only public results.

• Your websitePartner page: "Run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, or co-fund public goods with Gitcoin", a three-field contact form (name, email, anything else) and a "Trusted by leading protocols" section; no examples of partner results, costs or timelines on the page.Source
• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source
• Your websiteYield-powered matching case study (May 7, 2026): Gitcoin and Octant deployed "$2M" into a vault; "At ~4.5% APY, that translates to roughly $32,000 per quarter in accumulated yield flowing into matching"; campaigns funded "will carry Gitcoin x Octant co-branding"; a second tranche "of up to $1M" may follow after a 4 to 6 month pilot.Source

Reserve space for images and cards, render the full menu only when opened, defer HubSpot and analytics scripts, and check the search box for slow handlers.

Smoother pages keep researchers reading and help search visibility.

• Menu SEO

  Keep key links in the footer.

• Google PageSpeedChrome UX Report for real visitors: largest paint 1.9 seconds (good), but interaction delay 273 ms (good is under 200) and layout shift 0.12 (good is under 0.1), so the site does not pass Core Web Vitals. Google's lab test timed out on this run.Source
• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source

Work with the QF platforms (Giveth and others) on a cart for many projects, and add a one-click "fund this domain" option that splits a donation across the round's projects.

Lower friction raises the amount per donor, which is what fell between GG23 and GG24.

• Platform roadmaps differ

  Start with a domain split link if a cart isn't ready.

• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source
• Your websiteApps directory: 30 profiles including Giveth, Octant, Optimism RetroPGF, Drips, Juicebox, Karma GAP, Superfluid, Ethereum Foundation ESP and Base Builder Grants; each campaign page ends "Running a Funding Round? Get your campaign featured in our directory".Source

Build a "start a grants program" guide hub: choose a mechanism, choose a platform (linking app profiles), budget, timeline and pitfalls, with case studies as examples and a "partner with Gitcoin" call to action.

One practical hub turns a reference library into a lead source for partnerships.

• Seen as promotional

  Compare platforms fairly, including those Gitcoin doesn't run.

• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source
• Your websiteApps directory: 30 profiles including Giveth, Octant, Optimism RetroPGF, Drips, Juicebox, Karma GAP, Superfluid, Ethereum Foundation ESP and Base Builder Grants; each campaign page ends "Running a Funding Round? Get your campaign featured in our directory".Source
• Your websitePartner page: "Run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, or co-fund public goods with Gitcoin", a three-field contact form (name, email, anything else) and a "Trusted by leading protocols" section; no examples of partner results, costs or timelines on the page.Source
• Your websiteContribution guide: "Help build Ethereum's definitive funding resource"; high priority: "Case studies from recent funding rounds (GG24, RetroPGF4, etc.)", "Profiles of DAOs with active grant programs"; "Translations (coming soon)"; contributors "Join the Telegram" first, and can apply to "Become an Ongoing Researcher".Source

Set a public calendar, use the Ongoing Researcher program and the contribution guide's priority list (GG24 and RetroPGF case studies), and publish every two weeks.

Regular publishing keeps the newsletter full and the site cited.

• Quality drops

  Keep the review bar.

• Your websiteSitemap (244 URLs): newest lastmod May 7, 2026 (the Gitcoin x Octant yield-matching case study); mechanisms last updated March 5 and research March 6, 2026. /about, /partner and /updates are not in the sitemap. The footer YouTube link (youtube.com/gitcoin) returns 404.Source
• Your websiteContribution guide: "Help build Ethereum's definitive funding resource"; high priority: "Case studies from recent funding rounds (GG24, RetroPGF4, etc.)", "Profiles of DAOs with active grant programs"; "Translations (coming soon)"; contributors "Join the Telegram" first, and can apply to "Become an Ongoing Researcher".Source
• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source

Make 10 short explainers of the most-visited mechanisms, embed them on the mechanism pages, and post clips on X and Farcaster.

Video reaches people who won't read a long page and gives the channel a reason to exist again.

• Production time

  Start with screen-recorded talks.

• Your websiteSitemap (244 URLs): newest lastmod May 7, 2026 (the Gitcoin x Octant yield-matching case study); mechanisms last updated March 5 and research March 6, 2026. /about, /partner and /updates are not in the sitemap. The footer YouTube link (youtube.com/gitcoin) returns 404.Source
• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source
• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source

Package a co-branded "yield-powered round" offer for DAO treasuries: deposit, matching from yield, a Gitcoin-run or partner-run domain, and a quarterly report. Pitch 20 treasuries.

It gives funders a low-cost way in and Gitcoin a recurring matching source.

• Yield and smart contract risk

  Point to Octant's documentation and the pilot's stated failure signals.

• Your websiteYield-powered matching case study (May 7, 2026): Gitcoin and Octant deployed "$2M" into a vault; "At ~4.5% APY, that translates to roughly $32,000 per quarter in accumulated yield flowing into matching"; campaigns funded "will carry Gitcoin x Octant co-branding"; a second tranche "of up to $1M" may follow after a 4 to 6 month pilot.Source
• Your websitePartner page: "Run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, or co-fund public goods with Gitcoin", a three-field contact form (name, email, anything else) and a "Trusted by leading protocols" section; no examples of partner results, costs or timelines on the page.Source
• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source

Give every GG25 project a share kit: a personal donation link, an image, a short post, and a leaderboard of new donors brought in. Feature the top recruiters.

Projects reaching their own followers grows the donor base cheaply, and quadratic matching rewards many small donors.

• Sybil gaming

  Count only verified donors on the leaderboard.

• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source

Publish a yearly report: capital flows by mechanism and platform, notable rounds, what worked, with charts and a press kit. Launch it with partners.

An annual report earns links and press, and positions Gitcoin as the ecosystem's scorekeeper.

• Data gaps

  State sources and gaps clearly.

• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source
• Your websiteApps directory: 30 profiles including Giveth, Octant, Optimism RetroPGF, Drips, Juicebox, Karma GAP, Superfluid, Ethereum Foundation ESP and Base Builder Grants; each campaign page ends "Running a Funding Round? Get your campaign featured in our directory".Source

Email each of the 30 programs with a ready draft of their current round, and add a simple "funding calendar" view with deadlines for builders.

Builders return to a full calendar, and programs gain reach, which brings partners closer to Gitcoin.

• Stale listings

  Expire them automatically after the deadline.

• Your websiteApps directory: 30 profiles including Giveth, Octant, Optimism RetroPGF, Drips, Juicebox, Karma GAP, Superfluid, Ethereum Foundation ESP and Base Builder Grants; each campaign page ends "Running a Funding Round? Get your campaign featured in our directory".Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source
• Your websiteContribution guide: "Help build Ethereum's definitive funding resource"; high priority: "Case studies from recent funding rounds (GG24, RetroPGF4, etc.)", "Profiles of DAOs with active grant programs"; "Translations (coming soon)"; contributors "Join the Telegram" first, and can apply to "Become an Ongoing Researcher".Source

Give each donor wallet a page: projects funded, what those projects did next, and matching unlocked. Send a yearly "your impact" email before each round.

People give again when they see results, and shareable pages bring new donors.

• Privacy

  Opt-in pages only.

• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source
• Public recordsGitcoin, founded 2017, describes itself on Wikidata as an "open source community for blockchain-based funding and social software"; 20 news mentions in the last 30 days, mostly about the GTC token price.Source

Make the search answer those two questions with cited entries from the library and live campaigns, and offer an MCP or API endpoint so assistants can use the library.

A useful advisor turns a library into a tool people return to and makes Gitcoin the default source assistants cite.

• Wrong answers

  Always cite entries and show sources.

• Your websiteHomepage: title "Gitcoin - Fund What Matters"; "Your trusted directory and reference library for funding mechanisms, platforms, case studies, and research"; a "Search or ask anything" box; "Partner with us" and "Submit content" buttons. The "What We Curate" cards each say "120+" for case studies, mechanisms, research, campaigns and apps, while the sitemap lists 47 case studies, 79 mechanisms, 77 research pieces, 7 campaigns and 30 apps.Source
• Your websiteApps directory: 30 profiles including Giveth, Octant, Optimism RetroPGF, Drips, Juicebox, Karma GAP, Superfluid, Ethereum Foundation ESP and Base Builder Grants; each campaign page ends "Running a Funding Round? Get your campaign featured in our directory".Source
• Your websiteContribution guide: "Help build Ethereum's definitive funding resource"; high priority: "Case studies from recent funding rounds (GG24, RetroPGF4, etc.)", "Profiles of DAOs with active grant programs"; "Translations (coming soon)"; contributors "Join the Telegram" first, and can apply to "Become an Ongoing Researcher".Source

Package a round-in-a-box for non-crypto funders (fiat on-ramp, mechanism choice, reporting) and pilot with one open source foundation and one civic group.

New funders bring new matching capital and new donors to the ecosystem.

• Regulatory differences

  Get legal advice per country.

• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websitePartner page: "Run a community round, sponsor a matching pool, or co-fund public goods with Gitcoin", a three-field contact form (name, email, anything else) and a "Trusted by leading protocols" section; no examples of partner results, costs or timelines on the page.Source
• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source

Translate the top 20 mechanism and how-to pages into Spanish, Portuguese and Chinese with community translators, credited on the page.

Local-language pages open new search audiences and support regional rounds.

• Out-of-date translations

  Show the source date.

• Your websiteContribution guide: "Help build Ethereum's definitive funding resource"; high priority: "Case studies from recent funding rounds (GG24, RetroPGF4, etc.)", "Profiles of DAOs with active grant programs"; "Translations (coming soon)"; contributors "Join the Telegram" first, and can apply to "Become an Ongoing Researcher".Source
• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source

Build an interactive page: pick a past round, see which grantees grew and what the ecosystem gained. Make every result shareable.

A playful, data-backed tool spreads on social and makes the case for public goods funding.

• Overclaiming

  Show sources and caveats.

• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source

Invite past grantees to an alumni directory with what they built since, a monthly call, and a "give back" pledge for the next round.

Alumni giving back is the flywheel made visible, and it brings donors who already understand the mechanism.

• Low response

  Start with the most active grantees.

• Your websiteResearch library: books such as the "Onchain Capital Allocation Handbook" (two volumes) and "The Networked Firm", reports like "State of Public Goods Funding 2024" and "The Grantee-to-Funder Flywheel" (from "Plasma Group's modest QF grant to Optimism's 60M+ OP distribution, and from 1inch's $50K to $3M given back"), and a "d/acc Market Map"; case studies on 1inch, Optimism, EIP-1559 and UNICEF.Source
• Your websiteCampaigns page: 7 campaigns; Gitcoin Grants 24 "Ended" (Oct 2025, $1.8M across six domains), GG20 to GG23 ended; the two "Featured Campaigns" under "What's happening now" are Protocol Guild ($100M+ to ~190 core contributors) and TheDAO Security Fund ($220M+, "Projects TBD"). There is no GG25 page, although the homepage lists "GG25" as an example campaign.Source
• Your websiteGG24 campaign page: "QF donation volume ($36,657) was lower than GG23 ($95,278), reflecting narrower project scope (78 vs. 235 QF projects)", with "~1,286 unique donors"; partners contributed "$632.5K" through domain allocators; retrospectives "identified operational learnings: the need for bulk checkout to reduce donor friction, earlier eligibility finalization, stronger pre-round marketing". GG24 "was the first round after Grants Stack was sunset, with QF operations moved to Giveth and other mechanism-specific platforms."Source