Website review, no card needed
12thwonder.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 14 November 202638 issues · 86 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on 12thwonder.com, 18 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: google CDN adds 1.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 151 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 177 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Google CDN adds 1.6 s
1.6 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.5 s
A phone's processor spends 9.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Vimeo and others), adding 3.0 MB and 3.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.0 MBAbout 2.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 777 ms
777 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 777 ms of main-thread work and 480 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 486 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Vimeo adds 338 ms
338 msVimeo costs a phone 338 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
100 ms · 62 KiB2 images could be 62 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
111 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (111 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
50 ms · 56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 26.9 s
26.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s
2.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sYour largest element takes 4.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
30 images without width and height
30 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.4 MB in 152 requests
6.4 MBYour homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 152 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (62), scripts 2.6 MB (55) and other files 365 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
avtar2.B6FovlG3.png weighs 603 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
660 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example casestudy_how_a_north_american_oem_prod_7373bdadfa.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 289 px. Resized copies would save about 660 KiB.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.82 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.82 g of CO₂e: 218.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (3 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“We make AI work in the industries where it's hard…” and “We make AI work in the industries where it's hard…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
57 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 57 pages on 12thwonder.com and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “12thWonder delivers AI, GIS, cloud & mobile IT services for BFSI, utilities, telecom, defense, healthcare, manufacturin…”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “AI Engineering for Complex Industries | 12thWonder”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://12thwonder.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://12thwonder.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://12thwonder.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,926 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page with very little text
https://12thwonder.com/market-research has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,525 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,525 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start a Conversation”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Talk to an Expert Talk to an Expert”, “Start a Conversation” and “Talk to us →”.
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 27 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 12thwonder.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- SvelteKit
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 260
- Headquarters
- Pleasanton
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on 12thwonder.com, including 19 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.