Website review, no card needed
1816.com.hk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202648 issues · 96 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on 1816.com.hk, 23 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58F- #79,244 of 80,772 reviewed websitesbeats 2%
- #39,548 of 39,779 online storesbeats 0%
- #706 of 715 BigCommerce storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among BigCommerce stores
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.3 s · 1.3 MB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.0 s · 1.1 MB5 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.0 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 234 KiBAbout 234 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN, Google Fonts and globle-un.com), adding 1.7 MB and 87 ms of main-thread time.
Cloudflare CDN adds 73 ms
73 msCloudflare CDN costs a phone 73 ms of main-thread work and 444 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
globle-un.com adds 0 ms
0 msgloble-un.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
230 ms · 26 KiB26 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 117 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.3 s
A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 38 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.1 s
12.1 sYour largest element takes 12.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “hk001.jpg”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 12.1 s
12.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.422
0.422The layout shifts by 0.422 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 67 ms
67 msScripts block the page for only 67 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
hk002.jpg weighs 499 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
682 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example hk002.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 367 px. Resized copies would save about 682 KiB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.56 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.56 g of CO₂e: 67.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 34 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 34 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (9), scripts 401 KiB (10) and stylesheets 279 KiB (13). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a valid value for the lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
21 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 21 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “關於我們”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
16 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 16 pages on 1816.com.hk and 7 external pages.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://1816.com.hk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
/pages/%E8%81%AF%E7%B5%A1%E6%88%91%E5%80%91.html, /pages/%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91.html, /pages/%E6%A5%AD%E5%8B%99%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.html, /pages/%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%84%AA%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E9%AB%98%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E5%B0%88%E6%89%8D.html, /pages/%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%83%E8%90%AC%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.html and /pages/%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A.html and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages without an H1
/pages/%E8%81%AF%E7%B5%A1%E6%88%91%E5%80%91.html, /pages/%E6%A5%AD%E5%8B%99%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.html, /pages/%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%84%AA%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E9%AB%98%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E5%B0%88%E6%89%8D.html, /pages/%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%83%E8%90%AC%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.html, /pages/%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A.html and /pages/%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E5%A4%A5%E4%BC%B4.html and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages with very little text
/pages/%E8%81%AF%E7%B5%A1%E6%88%91%E5%80%91.html, /pages/%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91.html, /pages/%E6%A5%AD%E5%8B%99%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9.html, /pages/%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%84%AA%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E9%AB%98%E6%89%8D%E3%80%81%E5%B0%88%E6%89%8D.html, /pages/%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%83%E8%90%AC%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.html and /pages/%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A.html and 2 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://shop31959.globle-un.com/pages/%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%83%E8%90%AC%E6%8A%95%E8%B3%87%E7%A7%BB%E6%B0%91%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.html (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (1816.com.hk).
Valid certificate (52 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for 1816.com.hk and is valid for another 52 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://1816.com.hk redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
1816.com.hk has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 23 words
The homepage has only about 23 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
1816.com.hk has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 35/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:202.66.9.73 include:spf.trustyser.com ~all”.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- BigCommerce
- Hosting
- CITIC Telecom International CPC Limited
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on 1816.com.hk, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.