Website review, no card needed

1enduro.pl logo

1enduro.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 79 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on 1enduro.pl, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s604 msMay 23Nov 7892 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 2026987 ms
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 2026944 ms
Nov 7, 2026892 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
211 ms169 msMay 23Nov 7191 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026174 ms
May 30, 2026178 ms
Jun 6, 2026178 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026184 ms
Jun 27, 2026186 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026193 ms
Jul 18, 2026191 ms
Jul 25, 2026190 ms
Aug 1, 2026186 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026189 ms
Aug 29, 2026196 ms
Sep 5, 2026202 ms
Sep 12, 2026200 ms
Sep 19, 2026198 ms
Sep 26, 2026195 ms
Oct 3, 2026194 ms
Oct 10, 2026200 ms
Oct 17, 2026206 ms
Oct 24, 2026202 ms
Oct 31, 2026197 ms
Nov 7, 2026191 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 1enduro.pl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 1enduro.pl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. 1enduro.pl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. 1enduro.pl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. 1enduro.pl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. 1enduro.pl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. 1enduro.pl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. 1enduro.pl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. 1enduro.pl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix67
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 376 KiB

    About 376 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 202 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (202 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 MB

    8 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and OneSignal and others), adding 1.0 MB and 461 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 312 ms

    312 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 606 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    270 ms · 47 KiB

    About 47 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 270 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 84 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 537 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 174 ms to 191 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Real visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 275 ms

    275 ms

    Real visitors wait 275 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 84 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 87 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 87 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (24), scripts 1,008 KiB (30) and fonts 363 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    giant-trance-advanced-e-0-2027-test-13-1200x800.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (871 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    56 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example giant-trance-advanced-e-0-2027-test-13-1200x800.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 56 KiB.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.77 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.77 g of CO₂e: 92.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8890
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 41 text elements with low contrast

    41 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 108 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9282
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is short (26 characters)

    Your meta description is only 26 characters: “Blog rowerowy o enduro MTB”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 324 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 324 pages on 1enduro.pl and 2 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 36 characters

    Your title is a healthy 36 characters: “1Enduro - Blog rowerowy o enduro MTB”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.1enduro.pl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: CollectionPage, Person and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.1enduro.pl/post-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.1enduro.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,138 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 4 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/top-10, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/opony-enduro-poradnik, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/poradnik-zimowy and https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/night-ride are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.1enduro.pl/pierwszy-raz, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/top-10, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/opony-enduro-poradnik, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/poradnik-zimowy, https://www.1enduro.pl/tag/night-ride and https://www.1enduro.pl/category/ebike have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 80 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    32 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,032 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,032 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 1enduro.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on 1enduro.pl, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25