Website review, no card needed

1to1progress.com logo

1to1progress.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202618 issues · 73 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on 1to1progress.com, 5 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
9.5 s1.9 sMay 23Nov 72.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.5 s
Jun 27, 20264.5 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.5 s
Jul 25, 20266.2 s
Aug 1, 20267.1 s
Aug 8, 20267.3 s
Aug 15, 20267.6 s
Aug 22, 20267.8 s
Aug 29, 20268.2 s
Sep 5, 20268.6 s
Sep 12, 20267.5 s
Sep 19, 20266.5 s
Sep 26, 20265.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Oct 24, 20264.3 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Nov 7, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms100 msMay 23Nov 7105 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026138 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026118 ms
Jul 4, 2026114 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026115 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026125 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026113 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026127 ms
Sep 19, 2026128 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026126 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms
Oct 24, 2026119 ms
Oct 31, 2026117 ms
Nov 7, 2026105 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 1to1progress.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 1to1progress.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. 1to1progress.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. 1to1progress.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. 1to1progress.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. 1to1progress.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. 1to1progress.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. 1to1progress.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. 1to1progress.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

100
  • Improve image delivery

    32 KiB

    2 images could be 32 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    29 KiB

    About 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 100

    100/100

    Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 250 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 207 ms

    207 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 207 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 822 ms

    822 ms

    Real visitors wait 822 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

12 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 88 ms

    88 ms

    Real visitors wait 88 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 105 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Speed Index: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Faites des langues une opportunité de croissance Facilitez …”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.4 s.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.10 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.10 g of CO₂e: 11.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 347 KiB in 31 requests

    347 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 347 KiB in 31 requests on a phone: scripts 160 KiB (20), fonts 72 KiB (5) and HTML 67 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 24 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • 80 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 80 pages on 1to1progress.com and 12 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 127 characters

    Your meta description is 127 characters: “Découvrez nos formations linguistiques professionnelles conçues pour répondre aux besoins des entreprises et de leurs e…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Faites des langues une opportunité de croissance”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Formations Linguistiques pour Entreprises et Salariés | 7Speaking”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.7speaking.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.7speaking.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 4 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (892 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.7speaking.com/nos-solutions, https://www.7speaking.com/cartographie-des-competences and https://www.7speaking.com/nos-solutions/formation-soft-skills have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.7speaking.com/formation-anglais-defense and https://www.7speaking.com/formation-anglais-industrie-pharmaceutique use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Only about 231 words

    The homepage has only about 231 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 25 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 1to1progress.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
OVHcloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on 1to1progress.com, including 3 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25