Website review, no card needed
352delivery.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 13 November 202638 issues · 86 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on 352delivery.com, 12 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 328 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 130 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.0 s
2.5 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 4.9 MB50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 4.8 s
A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 1.9 MB34 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (posthog.com, Stripe and Google Maps and others), adding 1.6 MB and 622 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
650 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 42 ms
42 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 42 ms of main-thread work and 612 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 38 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 165 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
10 ms · 11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 58 ms
58 msYour server sent the HTML in 58 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.8 s
26.8 sYour largest element takes 26.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “landing-image”.
Speed Index: 17.9 s
17.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.6 s
33.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 40% slower for real visitors
+40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
46 images without width and height
46 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 238 ms
238 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 238 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 137 ms
137 msReal visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 63% faster for real visitors
-63%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 328 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025
0.025The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s
0.9 sThe first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.4 MB in 158 requests
7.4 MBYour homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 158 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (52), scripts 2.2 MB (49) and other files 512 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
1.9 MB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1794522846_carousel-sushi-natural.webp at 3,840 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.9 MB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
1794522846_carousel-sushi-natural.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
18 images below the first screen load straight away
18 images further down the page (544 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image in older formats
1 image (60 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.09 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.09 g of CO₂e: 250.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (166 characters)
Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
13 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 13 pages on 352delivery.com and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Gainesville Restaurant Delivery & Takeout”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “352 Delivery | Gainesville Food Delivery & Takeout”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.352delivery.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.352delivery.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.352delivery.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (475 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, https://www.352delivery.com/restaurants and https://www.352delivery.com/gift-certificate all use the title “352 Delivery | Gainesville Food Delivery & Takeout”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.352delivery.com/restaurants and https://www.352delivery.com/gift-certificate use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.352delivery.com/contact/general-query, whose canonical is https://www.352delivery.com/contact. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.352delivery.com/gift-certificate and https://www.352delivery.com/contact/general-query have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.352delivery.com/terms-of-service took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Framing 'https://pay.google.com/' violates the following report-only Content Security Policy directive: "frame-ancestor…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “61+ brands”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 454 words of copy
The homepage carries about 454 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download on the App Store”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Login / Sign Up”, “Join free and start earning” and “Start Your Order Now”.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 352delivery.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on 352delivery.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.